Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCLNX vs RYMBX
PCLNX vs RYMBX Comparison
Open Charts PCLNX vs RYMBX
PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS® Strategy I-3
Price$6.60
Change-$0.07 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.53B
Rydex Commodities Strategy H
Price$156.25
Change-$1.64 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.08M
PCLNX vs RYMBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCLNX vs. RYMBX commentary
Aug 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCLNX is a Hold and RYMBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCLNX has more cash in the bank: 4.53B vs. RYMBX (7.08M). PCLNX pays higher dividends than RYMBX: PCLNX (6.84) vs RYMBX (0.00). PCLNX was incepted earlier than RYMBX: PCLNX (7 years) vs RYMBX (20 years). RYMBX (1.87) is less costly to investors than PCLNX (1.20). RYMBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCLNX: RYMBX (2500) vs PCLNX (1000000). PCLNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.07 vs. RYMBX (5.97). PCLNX return over 5 years is better than : 135.06 vs. RYMBX (-8.51).
| PCLNX | RYMBX | PCLNX / RYMBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.65 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.87 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.533 | 4.841 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 4.53B | 7.08M | 63,941% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.84 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.07 | 5.97 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.77 | -14.53 | -74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 135.06 | -8.51 | -1,586% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -59.68 | - |