Ad is loading...
PCLNX vs RYMBX
PCLNX vs RYMBX Comparison
Open Charts PCLNX vs RYMBX
PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS® Strategy I-3
Price$6.00
Change-$0.07 (-1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.68B
Rydex Commodities Strategy H
Price$138.97
Change-$3.23 (-2.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.53M
PCLNX vs RYMBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCLNX vs. RYMBX commentary
Apr 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCLNX is a Hold and RYMBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCLNX has more cash in the bank: 4.68B vs. RYMBX (3.53M). PCLNX pays higher dividends than RYMBX: PCLNX (8.16) vs RYMBX (0.00). PCLNX was incepted earlier than RYMBX: PCLNX (7 years) vs RYMBX (20 years). RYMBX (1.80) is less costly to investors than PCLNX (1.20). RYMBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCLNX: RYMBX (2500) vs PCLNX (1000000). PCLNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.12 vs. RYMBX (-10.09). PCLNX return over 5 years is better than : 154.51 vs. RYMBX (-8.39).
| PCLNX | RYMBX | PCLNX / RYMBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.61 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.80 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.541 | -5.578 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 4.68B | 3.53M | 132,606% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.16 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.12 | -10.09 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.40 | -24.15 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | 154.51 | -8.39 | -1,842% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -68.27 | - |