Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCNNX vs RCBHX
PCNNX vs RCBHX Comparison
Open Charts PCNNX vs RCBHX
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond I-3
Price$9.22
Change-$0.02 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.45B
American Funds Corporate Bond R5E
Price$9.63
Change-$0.03 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.97B
PCNNX vs RCBHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCNNX vs. RCBHX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCNNX is a Hold and RCBHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCNNX has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. RCBHX (1.97B). PCNNX (4.46) and RCBHX (4.44) have matching dividends . PCNNX was incepted earlier than RCBHX: PCNNX (7 years) vs RCBHX (9 years). PCNNX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RCBHX (0.47). PCNNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 270.00 vs. RCBHX (216.00). RCBHX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCNNX: RCBHX (250) vs PCNNX (1000000). PCNNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.50 vs. RCBHX (1.91). PCNNX return over 5 years is better than : 0.59 vs. RCBHX (-6.02).
| PCNNX | RCBHX | PCNNX / RCBHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.47 | 234% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.47 | 245% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.168 | 4.952 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.5B | 1.97B | 635% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.46 | 4.44 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.50 | 1.91 | 236% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.60 | 13.47 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.59 | -6.02 | -10% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement