PCOLF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.01 (-20.00%)
Updated
Jul 9 closing price
Capitalization
97.58M
PROSF
Price
$60.10
Change
+$0.10 (+0.17%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
234.22B
Interact to see
Advertisement

PCOLF vs PROSF

Header iconPCOLF vs PROSF Comparison
Open Charts PCOLF vs PROSFBanner chart's image
Pacific Online
Price$0.04
Change-$0.01 (-20.00%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization97.58M
Prosus
Price$60.10
Change+$0.10 (+0.17%)
Volume$6.3K
Capitalization234.22B
PCOLF vs PROSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PROSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PCOLF vs. PROSF commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCOLF is a Hold and PROSF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (PCOLF: $0.04 vs. PROSF: $60.60)
Brand notoriety: PCOLF and PROSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Software/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PCOLF: 100% vs. PROSF: 6%
Market capitalization -- PCOLF: $97.58M vs. PROSF: $234.22B
PCOLF [@Internet Software/Services] is valued at $97.58M. PROSF’s [@Internet Software/Services] market capitalization is $234.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Software/Services] industry ranges from $1.94T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Software/Services] industry is $70.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PCOLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePROSF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PCOLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PROSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PROSF is a better buy in the long-term than PCOLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PROSF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PROSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

PCOLF (@Internet Software/Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PROSF (@Internet Software/Services) price change was +7.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was +2.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.22%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Software/Services (+2.49% weekly)

Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PROSF($234B) has a higher market cap than PCOLF($97.6M). PCOLF has higher P/E ratio than PROSF: PCOLF (22.73) vs PROSF (10.89). PROSF YTD gains are higher at: 44.527 vs. PCOLF (0.000). PROSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.77B vs. PCOLF (-84K). PROSF has more cash in the bank: 15.9B vs. PCOLF (392M). PCOLF has less debt than PROSF: PCOLF (587K) vs PROSF (15.5B). PROSF has higher revenues than PCOLF: PROSF (7.35B) vs PCOLF (816M).
PCOLFPROSFPCOLF / PROSF
Capitalization97.6M234B0%
EBITDA-84K5.77B-0%
Gain YTD0.00044.527-
P/E Ratio22.7310.89209%
Revenue816M7.35B11%
Total Cash392M15.9B2%
Total Debt587K15.5B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PCOLF vs PROSF: Fundamental Ratings
PCOLF
PROSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3537
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10066
SMR RATING
1..100
8915
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7238
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5670
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PCOLF's Valuation (1) in the null industry is in the same range as PROSF (22). This means that PCOLF’s stock grew similarly to PROSF’s over the last 12 months.

PROSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PCOLF (100). This means that PROSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PCOLF’s over the last 12 months.

PROSF's SMR Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PCOLF (89). This means that PROSF’s stock grew significantly faster than PCOLF’s over the last 12 months.

PROSF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PCOLF (72). This means that PROSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PCOLF’s over the last 12 months.

PCOLF's P/E Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as PROSF (70). This means that PCOLF’s stock grew similarly to PROSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PCOLFPROSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
4%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
4%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PROSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BIOX3.750.05
+1.35%
Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp
MTEX8.33N/A
N/A
Mannatech
ALCY11.72N/A
N/A
Alchemy Investments Acquisition Corp
SBAC233.92-1.20
-0.51%
SBA Communications Corp
SBSW9.24-0.36
-3.75%
Sibanye-Stillwater

PCOLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PCOLF and PROSF have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PCOLF and PROSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PCOLF
1D Price
Change %
PCOLF100%
N/A
PROSF - PCOLF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.83%
PROSY - PCOLF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
NPSNY - PCOLF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
QQQFF - PCOLF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RTMVF - PCOLF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PROSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PROSF has been loosely correlated with TCEHY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PROSF jumps, then TCEHY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PROSF
1D Price
Change %
PROSF100%
+0.83%
TCEHY - PROSF
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
NAPRF - PROSF
36%
Loosely correlated
-2.10%
TCTZF - PROSF
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
ATHM - PROSF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
BIDU - PROSF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.21%
More