Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCSVX vs SSGSX
PCSVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PCSVX vs SSGSX
PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity P
Price$16.89
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net AssetsN/A
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$44.37
Change-$0.09 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.96B
PCSVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCSVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCSVX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCSVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: PCSVX (0.91) vs SSGSX (0.49). PCSVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PCSVX (30 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than PCSVX (1.11). PCSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCSVX: SSGSX (2500) vs PCSVX (10000). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.94 vs. PCSVX (-18.95). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 2.50 vs. PCSVX (-16.24).
| PCSVX | SSGSX | PCSVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.26 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.26 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.973 | -4.243 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 2500 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | N/A | 4.96B | - |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 0.49 | 188% |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.95 | -13.94 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | -20.59 | -10.31 | 200% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.24 | 2.50 | -649% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.07 | 12.84 | -102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement