Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCSVX vs SSGSX
PCSVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PCSVX vs SSGSX
PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity P
Price$17.89
Change-$0.06 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net AssetsN/A
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.18
Change-$0.11 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.63B
PCSVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCSVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCSVX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCSVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: PCSVX (0.93) vs SSGSX (0.50). PCSVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PCSVX (30 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than PCSVX (1.11). PCSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCSVX: SSGSX (2500) vs PCSVX (10000). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.93 vs. PCSVX (-9.51). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 20.68 vs. PCSVX (1.33).
| PCSVX | SSGSX | PCSVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.26 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.26 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.179 | 1.852 | 226% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 2500 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | N/A | 5.63B | - |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 0.50 | 186% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.51 | -3.93 | 242% |
| Returns for 3 years | -16.42 | -0.85 | 1,936% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.33 | 20.68 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.46 | 24.03 | -19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement