PCWLF
Price
$0.67
Change
+$0.04 (+6.35%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
5.17B
QBCAF
Price
$31.95
Change
+$4.80 (+17.68%)
Updated
Sep 10 closing price
Capitalization
7.06B
Interact to see
Advertisement

PCWLF vs QBCAF

Header iconPCWLF vs QBCAF Comparison
Open Charts PCWLF vs QBCAFBanner chart's image
PCCW
Price$0.67
Change+$0.04 (+6.35%)
Volume$240
Capitalization5.17B
Quebecor
Price$31.95
Change+$4.80 (+17.68%)
Volume$100
Capitalization7.06B
PCWLF vs QBCAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PCWLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QBCAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PCWLF vs. QBCAF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCWLF is a Hold and QBCAF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (PCWLF: $0.67 vs. QBCAF: $31.95)
Brand notoriety: PCWLF and QBCAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PCWLF: 10% vs. QBCAF: 100%
Market capitalization -- PCWLF: $5.17B vs. QBCAF: $7.06B
PCWLF [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $5.17B. QBCAF’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $7.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $267.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PCWLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQBCAF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PCWLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QBCAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, QBCAF is a better buy in the long-term than PCWLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PCWLF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QBCAF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PCWLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • QBCAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QBCAF is a better buy in the short-term than PCWLF.

Price Growth

PCWLF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а -1.69% price change this week, while QBCAF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.67%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+0.03% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QBCAF($7.06B) has a higher market cap than PCWLF($5.17B). QBCAF YTD gains are higher at: 29.346 vs. PCWLF (13.894). PCWLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.8B vs. QBCAF (2.3B). PCWLF has more cash in the bank: 3.14B vs. QBCAF (21M). QBCAF has less debt than PCWLF: QBCAF (7.48B) vs PCWLF (59.3B). PCWLF has higher revenues than QBCAF: PCWLF (38.8B) vs QBCAF (5.61B).
PCWLFQBCAFPCWLF / QBCAF
Capitalization5.17B7.06B73%
EBITDA5.8B2.3B252%
Gain YTD13.89429.34647%
P/E RatioN/A13.29-
Revenue38.8B5.61B691%
Total Cash3.14B21M14,967%
Total Debt59.3B7.48B793%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PCWLF vs QBCAF: Fundamental Ratings
PCWLF
QBCAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8655
SMR RATING
1..100
10028
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5443
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8523
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PCWLF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QBCAF (64). This means that PCWLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than QBCAF’s over the last 12 months.

QBCAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as PCWLF (86). This means that QBCAF’s stock grew similarly to PCWLF’s over the last 12 months.

QBCAF's SMR Rating (28) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PCWLF (100). This means that QBCAF’s stock grew significantly faster than PCWLF’s over the last 12 months.

QBCAF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as PCWLF (54). This means that QBCAF’s stock grew similarly to PCWLF’s over the last 12 months.

QBCAF's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PCWLF (85). This means that QBCAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PCWLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PCWLFQBCAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
15%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
15%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
17%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
15%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
53%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
26%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PCWLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QBCAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WMGAX26.260.25
+0.96%
Macquarie Mid Cap Growth A
BPAIX34.060.27
+0.80%
Boston Partners All Cap Value Instl
ASMNX22.690.17
+0.75%
AQR Small Cap Momentum Style N
WSHFX66.430.42
+0.64%
American Funds Washington Mutual F1
MIQPX11.800.05
+0.43%
Morgan Stanley Inst International Eq R6

PCWLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PCWLF and MTNOY have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PCWLF and MTNOY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PCWLF
1D Price
Change %
PCWLF100%
+6.50%
MTNOY - PCWLF
15%
Poorly correlated
+4.41%
MYTAY - PCWLF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NPPXF - PCWLF
12%
Poorly correlated
+11.83%
PTITF - PCWLF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PTXKY - PCWLF
5%
Poorly correlated
-14.55%
More

QBCAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QBCAF and SFBQF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QBCAF and SFBQF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QBCAF
1D Price
Change %
QBCAF100%
N/A
SFBQF - QBCAF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.96%
PCWLF - QBCAF
4%
Poorly correlated
+6.50%
SFTBY - QBCAF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.73%
NPPXF - QBCAF
3%
Poorly correlated
+11.83%
SGAPY - QBCAF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
More