Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PDBAX vs PDBZX
PDBAX vs PDBZX Comparison
Open Charts PDBAX vs PDBZX
PGIM Total Return Bond A
Price$11.99
Change+$0.02 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.35B
PGIM Total Return Bond Z
Price$11.95
Change+$0.02 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.35B
PDBAX vs PDBZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PDBAX vs. PDBZX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PDBAX is a Hold and PDBZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBAX (49.3B) and PDBZX (49.3B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . PDBZX pays higher dividends than PDBAX: PDBZX (4.60) vs PDBAX (4.34). PDBAX was incepted earlier than PDBZX: PDBAX (31 years) vs PDBZX (29 years). PDBAX (0.77) is less costly to investors than PDBZX (0.50). PDBAX (113.00) and PDBZX (113.00) have comparable annual turnover. PDBZX has a lower initial minimum investment than PDBAX: PDBZX (0) vs PDBAX (1000). PDBZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.11 vs. PDBAX (4.83). PDBZX return over 5 years is better than : -2.83 vs. PDBAX (-4.13).
| PDBAX | PDBZX | PDBAX / PDBZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.49 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.50 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.326 | 3.467 | 96% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.3B | 49.3B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.34 | 4.60 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.83 | 5.11 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.18 | 9.03 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.13 | -2.83 | 146% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.34 | 20.54 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers