Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PDBAX vs PIOBX
PDBAX vs PIOBX Comparison
Open Charts PDBAX vs PIOBX
PGIM Total Return Bond A
Price$12.22
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.92B
Victory Pioneer Bond A
Price$8.53
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.13B
PDBAX vs PIOBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PDBAX vs. PIOBX commentary
Nov 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PDBAX is a Hold and PIOBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBAX has more cash in the bank: 51.9B vs. PIOBX (5.13B). PIOBX pays higher dividends than PDBAX: PIOBX (4.83) vs PDBAX (4.29). PDBAX was incepted earlier than PIOBX: PDBAX (31 years) vs PIOBX (47 years). PIOBX (0.83) is less costly to investors than PDBAX (0.77). PDBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. PIOBX (44.00). PIOBX initial investment is less costly to investors than PDBAX (3%) vs PDBAX (3%). PDBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PIOBX: PDBAX (1000) vs PIOBX (2500). PIOBX (7.04) and PDBAX (6.74) have marching annual gain over last year. PDBAX return over 5 years is better than : -2.08 vs. PIOBX (-3.52).
| PDBAX | PIOBX | PDBAX / PIOBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.81 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.83 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 47 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.759 | 7.668 | 88% |
| Front Load | 3% | 5% | 72% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.9B | 5.13B | 1,012% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.29 | 4.83 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.74 | 7.04 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.46 | 18.03 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.08 | -3.52 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.43 | 20.53 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers