Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PDBAX vs PTTAX
PDBAX vs PTTAX Comparison
Open Charts PDBAX vs PTTAX
PGIM Total Return Bond A
Price$12.27
Change+$0.04 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.17B
PIMCO Total Return A
Price$8.83
Change+$0.03 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.82B
PDBAX vs PTTAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PDBAX vs. PTTAX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PDBAX is a Hold and PTTAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBAX has more cash in the bank: 51.2B vs. PTTAX (44.8B). PDBAX (4.33) and PTTAX (4.21) have matching dividends . PDBAX was incepted earlier than PTTAX: PDBAX (31 years) vs PTTAX (29 years). PTTAX (0.87) is less costly to investors than PDBAX (0.77). PTTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 606.00 vs. PDBAX (113.00). PTTAX initial investment is less costly to investors than PDBAX (3%) vs PDBAX (3%). PDBAX (1000) and PTTAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PTTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.89 vs. PDBAX (3.47). PDBAX return over 5 years is better than : -1.40 vs. PTTAX (-4.63).
| PDBAX | PTTAX | PDBAX / PTTAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.87 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.87 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.174 | 6.757 | 91% |
| Front Load | 3% | 4% | 87% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.2B | 44.8B | 114% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.33 | 4.21 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.47 | 3.89 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.45 | 13.29 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.40 | -4.63 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.24 | 13.76 | 147% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement