Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PDBAX vs RFCTX
PDBAX vs RFCTX Comparison
Open Charts PDBAX vs RFCTX
PGIM Total Return Bond A
Price$12.27
Change-$0.03 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.57B
Russell Inv Strategic Bond S
Price$9.36
Change-$0.02 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.95B
PDBAX vs RFCTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PDBAX vs. RFCTX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PDBAX is a Hold and RFCTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBAX has more cash in the bank: 51.6B vs. RFCTX (1.95B). RFCTX (4.49) and PDBAX (4.33) have matching dividends . PDBAX was incepted earlier than RFCTX: PDBAX (31 years) vs RFCTX (17 years). PDBAX (0.77) is less costly to investors than RFCTX (0.68). PDBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. RFCTX (91.00). RFCTX has a lower initial minimum investment than PDBAX: RFCTX (0) vs PDBAX (1000). PDBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.47 vs. RFCTX (2.20). PDBAX return over 5 years is better than : -1.03 vs. RFCTX (-9.09).
| PDBAX | RFCTX | PDBAX / RFCTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.56 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.68 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.782 | 6.815 | 100% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.6B | 1.95B | 2,646% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.33 | 4.49 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.47 | 2.20 | 158% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.32 | 11.19 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.03 | -9.09 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.59 | 6.98 | 295% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement