Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PDBAX vs WAPAX
PDBAX vs WAPAX Comparison
Open Charts PDBAX vs WAPAX
PGIM Total Return Bond A
Price$12.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.17B
Western Asset Core Plus Bond A
Price$9.21
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.44B
PDBAX vs WAPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PDBAX vs. WAPAX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PDBAX is a Hold and WAPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBAX has more cash in the bank: 49.2B vs. WAPAX (4.44B). WAPAX (4.40) and PDBAX (4.34) have matching dividends . PDBAX was incepted earlier than WAPAX: PDBAX (31 years) vs WAPAX (13 years). WAPAX (0.82) is less costly to investors than PDBAX (0.77). PDBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. WAPAX (96.00). WAPAX initial investment is less costly to investors than PDBAX (3%) vs PDBAX (3%). PDBAX (1000) and WAPAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PDBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.10 vs. WAPAX (4.06). PDBAX return over 5 years is better than : -2.74 vs. WAPAX (-11.96).
| PDBAX | WAPAX | PDBAX / WAPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.82 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.82 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.499 | 3.933 | 89% |
| Front Load | 3% | 4% | 87% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.2B | 4.44B | 1,108% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.34 | 4.40 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.10 | 4.06 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.84 | 5.26 | 187% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.74 | -11.96 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.37 | 10.95 | 168% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement