Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PDBZX vs PTRAX
PDBZX vs PTRAX Comparison
Open Charts PDBZX vs PTRAX
PGIM Total Return Bond Z
Price$12.20
Change-$0.02 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.38B
PIMCO Total Return Admin
Price$8.81
Change-$0.02 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.82B
PDBZX vs PTRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PDBZX vs. PTRAX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PDBZX is a Hold and PTRAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBZX has more cash in the bank: 51.4B vs. PTRAX (44.8B). PDBZX pays higher dividends than PTRAX: PDBZX (4.60) vs PTRAX (4.30). PDBZX was incepted earlier than PTRAX: PDBZX (29 years) vs PTRAX (31 years). PTRAX (0.78) is less costly to investors than PDBZX (0.50). PTRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 606.00 vs. PDBZX (113.00). PDBZX has a lower initial minimum investment than PTRAX: PDBZX (0) vs PTRAX (1000000). PTRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.22 vs. PDBZX (3.91). PDBZX return over 5 years is better than : 0.06 vs. PTRAX (-3.95).
| PDBZX | PTRAX | PDBZX / PTRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.78 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.78 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.635 | 7.185 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.4B | 44.8B | 115% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.60 | 4.30 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.91 | 4.22 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.65 | 13.99 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.06 | -3.95 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.83 | 15.31 | 156% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers