Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PDBZX vs PTTAX
PDBZX vs PTTAX Comparison
Open Charts PDBZX vs PTTAX
PGIM Total Return Bond Z
Price$12.16
Change-$0.03 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.66B
PIMCO Total Return A
Price$8.80
Change-$0.02 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.38B
PDBZX vs PTTAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PDBZX vs. PTTAX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PDBZX is a Hold and PTTAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBZX has more cash in the bank: 51.7B vs. PTTAX (45.4B). PDBZX pays higher dividends than PTTAX: PDBZX (4.56) vs PTTAX (4.19). PDBZX was incepted earlier than PTTAX: PDBZX (29 years) vs PTTAX (29 years). PTTAX (0.87) is less costly to investors than PDBZX (0.50). PTTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 606.00 vs. PDBZX (113.00). PDBZX has a lower initial minimum investment than PTTAX: PDBZX (0) vs PTTAX (1000). PTTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.21 vs. PDBZX (4.93). PDBZX return over 5 years is better than : 0.83 vs. PTTAX (-3.80).
| PDBZX | PTTAX | PDBZX / PTTAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.87 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.87 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.777 | 7.354 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.7B | 45.4B | 114% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.56 | 4.19 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.93 | 5.21 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.69 | 18.85 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.83 | -3.80 | -22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.62 | 13.99 | 169% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers