Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PDBZX vs RFCTX
PDBZX vs RFCTX Comparison
Open Charts PDBZX vs RFCTX
PGIM Total Return Bond Z
Price$11.92
Change-$0.05 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.91B
Russell Inv Strategic Bond S
Price$9.12
Change-$0.03 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.93B
PDBZX vs RFCTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PDBZX vs. RFCTX commentary
Jul 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PDBZX is a Hold and RFCTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBZX has more cash in the bank: 48.9B vs. RFCTX (1.93B). RFCTX (4.66) and PDBZX (4.60) have matching dividends . PDBZX was incepted earlier than RFCTX: PDBZX (29 years) vs RFCTX (17 years). RFCTX (0.68) is less costly to investors than PDBZX (0.50). PDBZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. RFCTX (91.00). PDBZX (0) and RFCTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PDBZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.50 vs. RFCTX (3.42). PDBZX return over 5 years is better than : -1.83 vs. RFCTX (-11.09).
| PDBZX | RFCTX | PDBZX / RFCTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.56 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.68 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.207 | 3.407 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.9B | 1.93B | 2,532% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.60 | 4.66 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.50 | 3.42 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.07 | 5.21 | 193% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.83 | -11.09 | 17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.92 | 4.65 | 450% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement