Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PDBZX vs RFCTX
PDBZX vs RFCTX Comparison
Open Charts PDBZX vs RFCTX
PGIM Total Return Bond Z
Price$12.23
Change-$0.02 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.57B
Russell Inv Strategic Bond S
Price$9.36
Change-$0.02 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.95B
PDBZX vs RFCTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PDBZX vs. RFCTX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PDBZX is a Hold and RFCTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBZX has more cash in the bank: 51.6B vs. RFCTX (1.95B). PDBZX (4.60) and RFCTX (4.49) have matching dividends . PDBZX was incepted earlier than RFCTX: PDBZX (29 years) vs RFCTX (17 years). RFCTX (0.68) is less costly to investors than PDBZX (0.50). PDBZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. RFCTX (91.00). PDBZX (0) and RFCTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PDBZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.66 vs. RFCTX (2.20). PDBZX return over 5 years is better than : 0.24 vs. RFCTX (-9.09).
| PDBZX | RFCTX | PDBZX / RFCTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.56 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.68 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.897 | 6.815 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.6B | 1.95B | 2,646% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.60 | 4.49 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.66 | 2.20 | 166% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.16 | 11.19 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.24 | -9.09 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.79 | 6.98 | 341% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement