It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PDFS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSYZLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PDFS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SYZLF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
PDFS (@Packaged Software) experienced а -4.89% price change this week, while SYZLF (@Packaged Software) price change was -8.59% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.02%.
PDFS is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
PDFS | SYZLF | PDFS / SYZLF | |
Capitalization | 1.3B | 151M | 860% |
EBITDA | 8.39M | 13.6M | 62% |
Gain YTD | -9.210 | 12.109 | -76% |
P/E Ratio | 417.50 | 175.93 | 237% |
Revenue | 166M | 65.5M | 253% |
Total Cash | 136M | 11.6M | 1,172% |
Total Debt | 6.19M | 17.7M | 35% |
PDFS | SYZLF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 78 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 91 Overvalued | 96 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 47 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 87 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 93 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PDFS's Valuation (91) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as SYZLF (96) in the null industry. This means that PDFS’s stock grew similarly to SYZLF’s over the last 12 months.
PDFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SYZLF (100) in the null industry. This means that PDFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than SYZLF’s over the last 12 months.
PDFS's SMR Rating (87) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as SYZLF (90) in the null industry. This means that PDFS’s stock grew similarly to SYZLF’s over the last 12 months.
PDFS's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as SYZLF (62) in the null industry. This means that PDFS’s stock grew similarly to SYZLF’s over the last 12 months.
SYZLF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PDFS (93) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that SYZLF’s stock grew significantly faster than PDFS’s over the last 12 months.
PDFS | SYZLF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago61% | 2 days ago50% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago59% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago61% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago55% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago49% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago50% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago75% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago69% | 2 days ago41% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago60% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago58% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
NBRVX | 26.98 | N/A | N/A |
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val Inv | |||
CDVZX | 16.10 | -0.44 | -2.66% |
Columbia Large Cap Value Inst | |||
STMGX | 31.88 | -1.18 | -3.57% |
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr Inv | |||
VNVYX | 27.50 | -1.23 | -4.28% |
Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap Y | |||
LGRCX | 21.82 | -2.59 | -10.61% |
Loomis Sayles Growth C |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SYZLF has been loosely correlated with LYFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SYZLF jumps, then LYFT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SYZLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SYZLF | 100% | -3.87% | ||
LYFT - SYZLF | 33% Loosely correlated | -2.86% | ||
TCX - SYZLF | 30% Poorly correlated | -7.74% | ||
ORCL - SYZLF | 27% Poorly correlated | -2.53% | ||
UBER - SYZLF | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.33% | ||
PDFS - SYZLF | 26% Poorly correlated | -4.14% | ||
More |