PDIYF
Price
$0.28
Change
+$0.03 (+12.00%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
227.18M
PUCCF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
5.02M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PDIYF vs PUCCF

Header iconPDIYF vs PUCCF Comparison
Open Charts PDIYF vs PUCCFBanner chart's image
Predictive Discovery
Price$0.28
Change+$0.03 (+12.00%)
Volume$202
Capitalization227.18M
CAROLINA RUSH
Price$0.05
Change-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Volume$4K
Capitalization5.02M
PDIYF vs PUCCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PDIYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PUCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PDIYF vs. PUCCF commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PDIYF is a Hold and PUCCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (PDIYF: $0.28 vs. PUCCF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: PDIYF and PUCCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PDIYF: 1% vs. PUCCF: 25%
Market capitalization -- PDIYF: $227.18M vs. PUCCF: $5.02M
PDIYF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $227.18M. PUCCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $5.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PDIYF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePUCCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PDIYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PUCCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PDIYF is a better buy in the long-term than PUCCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PDIYF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PUCCF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PDIYF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PUCCF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PDIYF is a better buy in the short-term than PUCCF.

Price Growth

PDIYF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +13.73% price change this week, while PUCCF (@Precious Metals) price change was -10.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.46% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDIYF($227M) has a higher market cap than PUCCF($5.02M). PDIYF YTD gains are higher at: 89.381 vs. PUCCF (2.041). PUCCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.95M vs. PDIYF (-13.58M).
PDIYFPUCCFPDIYF / PUCCF
Capitalization227M5.02M4,518%
EBITDA-13.58M-2.95M460%
Gain YTD89.3812.0414,380%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total Cash8.64MN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PUCCF: Fundamental Ratings
PUCCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PDIYFPUCCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
67%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PDIYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PUCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QNST16.880.52
+3.18%
QuinStreet
DC4.020.07
+1.77%
Dakota Gold Corp
A113.23-1.66
-1.44%
Agilent Technologies
BIAF0.29-0.01
-2.75%
bioAffinity Technologies
IPGP72.14-2.49
-3.34%
IPG Photonics Corp

PDIYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PDIYF and PUCCF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PDIYF and PUCCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PDIYF
1D Price
Change %
PDIYF100%
N/A
PUCCF - PDIYF
24%
Poorly correlated
-10.39%
AZASF - PDIYF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.10%
ZPHYF - PDIYF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ADYRF - PDIYF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLVMF - PDIYF
6%
Poorly correlated
+16.41%
More

PUCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PUCCF and PDIYF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PUCCF and PDIYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PUCCF
1D Price
Change %
PUCCF100%
-10.39%
PDIYF - PUCCF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ONXGF - PUCCF
7%
Poorly correlated
+3.47%
PMCOF - PUCCF
4%
Poorly correlated
-4.99%
NPTLF - PUCCF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMUSF - PUCCF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
More