Advertisement
PDIYF vs SLVMF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PDIYF is a Buy and SLVMF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PDIYF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLVMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- PDIYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SLVMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PDIYF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLVMF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PDIYF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- SLVMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
PDIYF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SLVMF (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) price change was +71.43% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4920.20%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry was +0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.84%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Precious Metals (+4.91% weekly)The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.
@Agricultural Commodities/Milling (+0.97% weekly)The Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry includes companies that are involved in farming activities, such as crop production, livestock management and animal feed, for commercial purposes. The industry includes a wide range of operations from growing corn, to grain and oilseed processing to the operation of flour mills. Changes in consumer tastes is one of the critical factors influencing what products are grown and raised in this industry. Potential risks to the business include climate change and fluctuations in global prices of agricultural products. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Elanco Animal Health, Inc., Bunge Limited and Canopy Growth Corporation are some of the biggest U.S. companies operating in this industry.
| PDIYF | SLVMF | PDIYF / SLVMF | |
| Capitalization | 789M | 202M | 391% |
| EBITDA | -14.47M | -3.44M | 421% |
| Gain YTD | 121.305 | 162.009 | 75% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 179K | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
| PDIYF | SLVMF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 43% | 1 day ago 74% |
Advertisement
PDIYF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PDIYF and PUCCF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PDIYF and PUCCF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PDIYF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDIYF | 100% | N/A | ||
| PUCCF - PDIYF | 24% Poorly correlated | +9.17% | ||
| ZPHYF - PDIYF | 22% Poorly correlated | -2.98% | ||
| SLVMF - PDIYF | 6% Poorly correlated | +20.00% | ||
| GNSMF - PDIYF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NIOVF - PDIYF | 3% Poorly correlated | -4.71% | ||
More | ||||