Advertisement
PDIYF vs SLVMF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PDIYF is a Hold and SLVMF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PDIYF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLVMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- PDIYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SLVMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PDIYF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLVMF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PDIYF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SLVMF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
PDIYF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +4.62% price change this week, while SLVMF (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) price change was -8.71% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +68.33%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry was -2.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.01%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Precious Metals (-0.08% weekly)The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.
@Agricultural Commodities/Milling (-2.91% weekly)The Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry includes companies that are involved in farming activities, such as crop production, livestock management and animal feed, for commercial purposes. The industry includes a wide range of operations from growing corn, to grain and oilseed processing to the operation of flour mills. Changes in consumer tastes is one of the critical factors influencing what products are grown and raised in this industry. Potential risks to the business include climate change and fluctuations in global prices of agricultural products. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Elanco Animal Health, Inc., Bunge Limited and Canopy Growth Corporation are some of the biggest U.S. companies operating in this industry.
| PDIYF | SLVMF | PDIYF / SLVMF | |
| Capitalization | 1B | 217M | 462% |
| EBITDA | -14.47M | -3.44M | 421% |
| Gain YTD | 150.254 | 140.175 | 107% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 179K | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
| PDIYF | SLVMF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 60% | 13 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 79% |
Advertisement
PDIYF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PDIYF and PUCCF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PDIYF and PUCCF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PDIYF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDIYF | 100% | N/A | ||
| PUCCF - PDIYF | 24% Poorly correlated | +7.18% | ||
| ZPHYF - PDIYF | 22% Poorly correlated | -7.50% | ||
| SLVMF - PDIYF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GNSMF - PDIYF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NIOVF - PDIYF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SLVMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SLVMF and AUMBF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLVMF and AUMBF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SLVMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLVMF | 100% | N/A | ||
| AUMBF - SLVMF | 30% Poorly correlated | -3.29% | ||
| LNCLF - SLVMF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ELRRF - SLVMF | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.09% | ||
| HWAUF - SLVMF | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.53% | ||
| RDYFF - SLVMF | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||