PDIYF
Price
$0.33
Change
+$0.03 (+10.00%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
227.18M
SLVMF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.01 (-9.09%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
172.99M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PDIYF vs SLVMF

Header iconPDIYF vs SLVMF Comparison
Open Charts PDIYF vs SLVMFBanner chart's image
Predictive Discovery
Price$0.33
Change+$0.03 (+10.00%)
Volume$28.08K
Capitalization227.18M
Silver Mines Ltd., Sydney
Price$0.10
Change-$0.01 (-9.09%)
Volume$2.76K
Capitalization172.99M
PDIYF vs SLVMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PDIYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLVMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PDIYF vs. SLVMF commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PDIYF is a StrongBuy and SLVMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (PDIYF: $0.33)
Brand notoriety:
Market capitalization --

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PDIYF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.

  • PDIYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PDIYF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLVMF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PDIYF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SLVMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PDIYF is a better buy in the short-term than SLVMF.

Price Growth

PDIYF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +16.61% price change this weekfor the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.15%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.16% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDIYF($227M) has a higher market cap than SLVMF($173M). PDIYF (120.358) and SLVMF (116.157) have similar YTD gains . SLVMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -7.48M vs. PDIYF (-13.58M). SLVMF has more cash in the bank: 12.1M vs. PDIYF (8.64M).
PDIYFSLVMFPDIYF / SLVMF
Capitalization227M173M131%
EBITDA-13.58M-7.48M181%
Gain YTD120.358116.157104%
P/E RatioN/A55.56-
RevenueN/A159K-
Total Cash8.64M12.1M71%
Total DebtN/A4.91M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PDIYFSLVMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PDIYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLVMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TVRFX80.290.74
+0.93%
Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Core R3
ADJEX17.08N/A
N/A
Azzad Ethical
FRIFX12.20N/A
N/A
Fidelity Real Estate Income
DMIDX28.81N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon MidCap Index I
WAISX14.74N/A
N/A
Wasatch International Select Investor

PDIYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PDIYF and PUCCF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PDIYF and PUCCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PDIYF
1D Price
Change %
PDIYF100%
N/A
PUCCF - PDIYF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AZASF - PDIYF
23%
Poorly correlated
+9.00%
ZPHYF - PDIYF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.22%
ADYRF - PDIYF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLVMF - PDIYF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SLVMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLVMF and SBMCF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLVMF and SBMCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLVMF
1D Price
Change %
SLVMF100%
N/A
SBMCF - SLVMF
30%
Poorly correlated
-6.51%
AUMBF - SLVMF
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.79%
LNCLF - SLVMF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRTIF - SLVMF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELRRF - SLVMF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.35%
More