Advertisement
PECGF vs RBTEF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PECGF is a Hold and RBTEF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PECGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRBTEF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- PECGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RBTEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PECGF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RBTEF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PECGF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.
- RBTEF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
| PECGF | RBTEF | PECGF / RBTEF | |
| Capitalization | 7.22B | 2.01B | 359% |
| EBITDA | 3.63B | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.418 | 3.596 | -234% |
| P/E Ratio | 53.98 | 18.36 | 294% |
| Revenue | 30.8B | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 9.61B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 5.81B | N/A | - |
PECGF | RBTEF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 52 Fair valued | 97 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 57 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 27 | 78 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 30 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PECGF's Valuation (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RBTEF (97). This means that PECGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RBTEF’s over the last 12 months.
PECGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RBTEF (100). This means that PECGF’s stock grew similarly to RBTEF’s over the last 12 months.
RBTEF's SMR Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PECGF (90). This means that RBTEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PECGF’s over the last 12 months.
RBTEF's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as PECGF (58). This means that RBTEF’s stock grew similarly to PECGF’s over the last 12 months.
PECGF's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RBTEF (78). This means that PECGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RBTEF’s over the last 12 months.
| PECGF | RBTEF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 25% | 3 days ago 36% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 40% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 27% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 8% | 3 days ago 16% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 8% | 3 days ago 31% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 42% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 19% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| XHE | 77.93 | 0.77 | +1.00% |
| SPDR® S&P Health Care Equipment ETF | |||
| FTXR | 32.67 | 0.19 | +0.57% |
| First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF | |||
| CMDT | 26.18 | 0.08 | +0.31% |
| PIMCO Commodity Strategy Act Exc-Trd Fd | |||
| ZSEP | 26.17 | 0.03 | +0.11% |
| Innovator Equity Defined Prot ETF-1YrSep | |||
| FDL | 42.32 | N/A | N/A |
| First Trust Morningstar Div Leaders ETF | |||
PECGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PECGF has been loosely correlated with PTPIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PECGF jumps, then PTPIF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PECGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PECGF | 100% | N/A | ||
| PTPIF - PECGF | 41% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ALFFF - PECGF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SOMMY - PECGF | 4% Poorly correlated | +3.75% | ||
| SKFOF - PECGF | 3% Poorly correlated | +0.36% | ||
| SHECF - PECGF | 2% Poorly correlated | +0.41% | ||
More | ||||
RBTEF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RBTEF and LIN have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RBTEF and LIN's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RBTEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RBTEF | 100% | N/A | ||
| LIN - RBTEF | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.64% | ||
| SASOF - RBTEF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SHECF - RBTEF | 1% Poorly correlated | +0.41% | ||
| PECGF - RBTEF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SGLFF - RBTEF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||