Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PEMGX vs WFDRX
PEMGX vs WFDRX Comparison
Open Charts PEMGX vs WFDRX
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl R6
Price$33.99
Change+$0.20 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets947.28M
PEMGX vs WFDRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PEMGX vs. WFDRX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PEMGX is a Hold and WFDRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 33.1B vs. WFDRX (947M). PEMGX (0.00) and WFDRX (0.00) have matching dividends . PEMGX was incepted earlier than WFDRX: PEMGX (20 years) vs WFDRX (12 years). PEMGX (0.91) is less costly to investors than WFDRX (0.82). WFDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. PEMGX (10.50). WFDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than PEMGX: WFDRX (0) vs PEMGX (1000). PEMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.11 vs. WFDRX (0.60). PEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 41.29 vs. WFDRX (-28.70).
| PEMGX | WFDRX | PEMGX / WFDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.79 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.82 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.655 | 6.897 | 82% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 33.1B | 947M | 3,495% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.11 | 0.60 | 523% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.53 | 40.97 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.29 | -28.70 | -144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.47 | 1.29 | 8,260% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement