Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PEMGX vs WFDRX
PEMGX vs WFDRX Comparison
Open Charts PEMGX vs WFDRX
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl R6
Price$32.44
Change-$0.02 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets892.07M
PEMGX vs WFDRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PEMGX vs. WFDRX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PEMGX is a Hold and WFDRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 30.9B vs. WFDRX (892M). PEMGX (0.00) and WFDRX (0.00) have matching dividends . PEMGX was incepted earlier than WFDRX: PEMGX (20 years) vs WFDRX (12 years). PEMGX (0.91) is less costly to investors than WFDRX (0.82). WFDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. PEMGX (10.50). WFDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than PEMGX: WFDRX (0) vs PEMGX (1000). PEMGX (-6.54) and WFDRX (-6.62) have marching annual gain over last year. PEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 24.68 vs. WFDRX (-35.34).
| PEMGX | WFDRX | PEMGX / WFDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.79 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.82 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.680 | 2.689 | -25% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.9B | 892M | 3,464% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.54 | -6.62 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.28 | 29.27 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.68 | -35.34 | -70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.67 | -1.96 | -4,568% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers