Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PEMZX vs RNWBX
PEMZX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts PEMZX vs RNWBX
Putnam Emerging Markets Equity C
Price$14.36
Change-$0.20 (-1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets450.52M
American Funds New World R2
Price$81.86
Change-$1.00 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.74B
PEMZX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PEMZX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PEMZX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 67.7B vs. PEMZX (451M). PEMZX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: PEMZX (0.87) vs RNWBX (0.13). PEMZX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: PEMZX (17 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). PEMZX (2.25) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). PEMZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). PEMZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: PEMZX (0) vs RNWBX (250). PEMZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.01 vs. RNWBX (7.09). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 28.56 vs. PEMZX (25.12).
| PEMZX | RNWBX | PEMZX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.67 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.25 | 1.67 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.519 | 11.298 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 451M | 67.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 0.13 | 644% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.01 | 7.09 | 198% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.40 | 32.44 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.12 | 28.56 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.58 | 54.60 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers