Ad is loading...
PEMZX vs RNWFX
PEMZX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts PEMZX vs RNWFX
Putnam Emerging Markets Equity C
Price$13.14
Change-$0.27 (-2.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets378.81M
American Funds New World R5
Price$77.31
Change-$1.87 (-2.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.34B
PEMZX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PEMZX vs. RNWFX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PEMZX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 62.3B vs. PEMZX (379M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than PEMZX: RNWFX (1.17) vs PEMZX (0.91). PEMZX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: PEMZX (17 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). PEMZX (2.25) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). PEMZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). PEMZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: PEMZX (0) vs RNWFX (250). PEMZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.13 vs. RNWFX (-1.48). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.78 vs. PEMZX (43.28).
| PEMZX | RNWFX | PEMZX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.62 | 315% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.25 | 0.62 | 363% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.632 | 0.065 | 5,613% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 379M | 62.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 1.17 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.13 | -1.48 | -686% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.03 | 0.31 | 1,976% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.28 | 50.78 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.77 | 42.27 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...