Advertisement
PEP vs PG
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PEP is a Hold and PG is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PEP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- PEP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PEP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PEP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
PEP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а +1.32% price change this week, while PG (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +4.69% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.23%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +1.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.36%.
Reported Earning Dates
PEP is expected to report earnings on Jul 15, 2025.
PG is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-0.05% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
@Household/Personal Care (+1.67% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
| PEP | PG | PEP / PG | |
| Capitalization | 241B | 382B | 63% |
| EBITDA | 15.8B | 22.6B | 70% |
| Gain YTD | -13.652 | -0.104 | 13,126% |
| P/E Ratio | 26.37 | 26.90 | 98% |
| Revenue | 91.5B | 83.9B | 109% |
| Total Cash | 10B | 7.89B | 127% |
| Total Debt | 44.7B | 33.7B | 133% |
PEP | PG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 56 | 12 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 20 Undervalued | 45 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 75 | 22 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | 55 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PEP's Valuation (20) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as PG (45) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that PEP’s stock grew similarly to PG’s over the last 12 months.
PG's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PEP (75) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that PG’s stock grew somewhat faster than PEP’s over the last 12 months.
PG's SMR Rating (100) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as PEP (100) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that PG’s stock grew similarly to PEP’s over the last 12 months.
PG's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as PEP (63) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that PG’s stock grew similarly to PEP’s over the last 12 months.
PG's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as PEP (83) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that PG’s stock grew similarly to PEP’s over the last 12 months.
| PEP | PG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 39% | 1 day ago 36% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 37% | 1 day ago 51% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 43% | 1 day ago 40% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 38% | 1 day ago 45% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 41% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 45% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 41% | 8 days ago 37% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 31% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 6 days ago 27% |
Advertisement
PEP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PEP has been closely correlated with KDP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PEP jumps, then KDP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PEP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEP | 100% | -1.25% | ||
| KDP - PEP | 66% Closely correlated | -0.83% | ||
| KO - PEP | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| CCEP - PEP | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.43% | ||
| MNST - PEP | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| FIZZ - PEP | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.61% | ||
More | ||||
PG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PG has been closely correlated with CL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PG jumps, then CL could also see price increases.