Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PEPSX vs RNWBX
PEPSX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts PEPSX vs RNWBX
Principal Glb Emerging Markets R5
Price$31.70
Change-$0.08 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.12B
American Funds New World R2
Price$85.40
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.59B
PEPSX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PEPSX vs. RNWBX commentary
Aug 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PEPSX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70.6B vs. PEPSX (3.12B). RNWBX pays higher dividends than PEPSX: RNWBX (0.13) vs PEPSX (0.12). PEPSX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: PEPSX (25 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than PEPSX (1.32). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. PEPSX (28.50). PEPSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: PEPSX (0) vs RNWBX (250). PEPSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.05 vs. RNWBX (14.86). PEPSX return over 5 years is better than : 26.13 vs. RNWBX (21.45).
| PEPSX | RNWBX | PEPSX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.67 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.67 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.583 | 16.111 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.12B | 70.6B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 0.13 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.05 | 14.86 | 162% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.28 | 31.78 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.13 | 21.45 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.86 | 66.46 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement