Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PEPSX vs RNWBX
PEPSX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts PEPSX vs RNWBX
Principal Glb Emerging Markets R5
Price$34.85
Change-$0.22 (-0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.7B
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.96
Change-$0.29 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.16B
PEPSX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PEPSX vs. RNWBX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PEPSX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.2B vs. PEPSX (4.7B). RNWBX pays higher dividends than PEPSX: RNWBX (0.12) vs PEPSX (0.11). PEPSX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: PEPSX (25 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than PEPSX (1.32). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. PEPSX (28.50). PEPSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: PEPSX (0) vs RNWBX (250). PEPSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.14 vs. RNWBX (11.48). PEPSX return over 5 years is better than : 34.58 vs. RNWBX (25.41).
| PEPSX | RNWBX | PEPSX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.67 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.67 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 35.615 | 23.671 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.7B | 75.2B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.11 | 0.12 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.14 | 11.48 | 201% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.41 | 54.43 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.58 | 25.41 | 136% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.04 | 86.19 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers