Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PESPX vs VIMSX
PESPX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts PESPX vs VIMSX
BNY Mellon MidCap Index I
Price$28.80
Change+$0.09 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.33B
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$77.20
Change+$0.03 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets198.55B
PESPX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PESPX vs. VIMSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PESPX is a Hold and VIMSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 199B vs. PESPX (1.33B). VIMSX pays higher dividends than PESPX: VIMSX (1.38) vs PESPX (1.01). PESPX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: PESPX (34 years) vs VIMSX (28 years). PESPX (0.51) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). PESPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.87 vs. VIMSX (16.00). PESPX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: PESPX (2500) vs VIMSX (3000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.39 vs. PESPX (-11.65). VIMSX return over 5 years is better than : 45.66 vs. PESPX (-13.65).
| PESPX | VIMSX | PESPX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.17 | 300% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.17 | 300% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.628 | 7.167 | 23% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.33B | 199B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.01 | 1.38 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.65 | 3.39 | -343% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.69 | 35.44 | -25% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.65 | 45.66 | -30% |
| Returns for 10 years | -21.29 | 133.73 | -16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement