PFBC
Price
$90.73
Change
+$0.81 (+0.90%)
Updated
Nov 19 closing price
Capitalization
1.1B
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SI
Price
$14.14
Change
-$0.71 (-4.78%)
Updated
Nov 19 closing price
Capitalization
291.31M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PFBC vs SI

Header iconPFBC vs SI Comparison
Open Charts PFBC vs SIBanner chart's image
Preferred Bank
Price$90.73
Change+$0.81 (+0.90%)
Volume$53.1K
Capitalization1.1B
Shoulder Innovations
Price$14.14
Change-$0.71 (-4.78%)
Volume$53.67K
Capitalization291.31M
PFBC vs SI Comparison Chart in %
PFBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PFBC vs. SI commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFBC is a Hold and SI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (PFBC: $90.55 vs. SI: $14.14)
Brand notoriety: PFBC and SI are both not notable
PFBC represents the Regional Banks, while SI is part of the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PFBC: 68% vs. SI: 57%
Market capitalization -- PFBC: $1.1B vs. SI: $291.31M
PFBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.1B. SI’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $291.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.58B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $219.36B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.96B. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $5.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PFBC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PFBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PFBC is a better buy in the long-term than SI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PFBC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PFBC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PFBC is a better buy in the short-term than SI.

Price Growth

PFBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.97% price change this week, while SI (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -5.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.37%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -5.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

PFBC is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.93% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

@Medical/Nursing Services (-5.47% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFBC($1.1B) has a higher market cap than SI($291M). SI YTD gains are higher at: 1031.200 vs. PFBC (8.582).
PFBCSIPFBC / SI
Capitalization1.1B291M379%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD8.5821031.2001%
P/E Ratio9.10N/A-
Revenue280MN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt372MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PFBC vs SI: Fundamental Ratings
PFBC
SI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1579
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
23100
SMR RATING
1..100
2025
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5134
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
44100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SI's Valuation (51) in the null industry is in the same range as PFBC (52) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SI’s stock grew similarly to PFBC’s over the last 12 months.

PFBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for SI (100) in the null industry. This means that PFBC’s stock grew significantly faster than SI’s over the last 12 months.

PFBC's SMR Rating (20) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SI (25) in the null industry. This means that PFBC’s stock grew similarly to SI’s over the last 12 months.

SI's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as PFBC (51) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SI’s stock grew similarly to PFBC’s over the last 12 months.

PFBC's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SI (100) in the null industry. This means that PFBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PFBCSI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PFBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MNAT31.40N/A
N/A
Marquette National Corp.
VLUTF4.60N/A
N/A
Volution Group PLC
DVCMY6.15-0.18
-2.84%
DAVIDE CAMPARI MILANO N V
NSCIF0.13N/A
-3.03%
Nanalysis Scientific Corp.
BPAQF5.73-0.21
-3.54%
BP Plc