Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFBPX vs TNBMX
PFBPX vs TNBMX Comparison
Open Charts PFBPX vs TNBMX
PIMCO International Bond (USD-Hdg) I-2
Price$10.02
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.15B
T. Rowe Price Intl Bd (USD Hdgd) I
Price$8.62
Change+$0.01 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.33B
PFBPX vs TNBMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFBPX vs. TNBMX commentary
Oct 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFBPX is a Hold and TNBMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFBPX has more cash in the bank: 16.1B vs. TNBMX (7.33B). PFBPX pays higher dividends than TNBMX: PFBPX (4.31) vs TNBMX (3.45). PFBPX was incepted earlier than TNBMX: PFBPX (17 years) vs TNBMX (8 years). PFBPX (0.67) is less costly to investors than TNBMX (0.53). PFBPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 699.00 vs. TNBMX (54.50). TNBMX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFBPX: TNBMX (500000) vs PFBPX (1000000). PFBPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.29 vs. TNBMX (4.74). PFBPX return over 5 years is better than : 5.61 vs. TNBMX (-5.38).
| PFBPX | TNBMX | PFBPX / TNBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.53 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.53 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.102 | 3.771 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 500000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.1B | 7.33B | 220% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.31 | 3.45 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.29 | 4.74 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.75 | 11.92 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.61 | -5.38 | -104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.89 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers