Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFBPX vs TNBMX
PFBPX vs TNBMX Comparison
Open Charts PFBPX vs TNBMX
PIMCO International Bond (USD-Hdg) I-2
Price$9.95
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.98B
T. Rowe Price Intl Bd (USD Hdgd) I
Price$8.57
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.25B
PFBPX vs TNBMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFBPX vs. TNBMX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFBPX is a Hold and TNBMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFBPX has more cash in the bank: 16B vs. TNBMX (7.25B). PFBPX pays higher dividends than TNBMX: PFBPX (4.34) vs TNBMX (3.44). PFBPX was incepted earlier than TNBMX: PFBPX (17 years) vs TNBMX (8 years). PFBPX (0.67) is less costly to investors than TNBMX (0.53). PFBPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 699.00 vs. TNBMX (54.50). TNBMX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFBPX: TNBMX (500000) vs PFBPX (1000000). PFBPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.74 vs. TNBMX (3.39). PFBPX return over 5 years is better than : 5.05 vs. TNBMX (-5.88).
| PFBPX | TNBMX | PFBPX / TNBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.53 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.53 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.020 | 3.011 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 500000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16B | 7.25B | 221% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.34 | 3.44 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.74 | 3.39 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.81 | 6.12 | 242% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.05 | -5.88 | -86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.44 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers