Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFFD vs PFFV
PFFD vs PFFV Comparison
Open Charts PFFD vs PFFV
Global X US Preferred ETF
Price$18.73
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
Volume$1.42K
Net Assets2.26B
Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF
Price$22.54
Change+$0.02 (+0.09%)
Volume$200
Net Assets312.8M
PFFD vs PFFV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFFD vs. PFFV commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFFD is a Hold and PFFV is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFFD has more net assets: 2.26B vs. PFFV (313M). PFFV has a higher annual dividend yield than PFFD: PFFV (1.499) vs PFFD (1.169). PFFD was incepted earlier than PFFV: PFFD (8 years) vs PFFV (5 years). PFFD (0.23) has a lower expense ratio than PFFV (0.25). PFFV has a higher turnover PFFD (27.10) vs PFFD (27.10).
| PFFD | PFFV | PFFD / PFFV | |
| Gain YTD | 1.169 | 1.499 | 78% |
| Net Assets | 2.26B | 313M | 720% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.23 | 0.25 | 92% |
| Turnover | 27.10 | 58.94 | 46% |
| Yield | 6.32 | 7.59 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| PFFD | PFFV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 56% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 64% | 10 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
PFFD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFFD has been closely correlated with HBANP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFFD jumps, then HBANP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PFFD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFFD | 100% | -0.05% | ||
| HBANP - PFFD | 73% Closely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| NTRSO - PFFD | 71% Closely correlated | +0.05% | ||
| ACGLO - PFFD | 67% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| ACGLN - PFFD | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| FITBO - PFFD | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.35% | ||
More | ||||
PFFV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFFV has been loosely correlated with MBINM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PFFV jumps, then MBINM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PFFV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFFV | 100% | +0.09% | ||
| MBINM - PFFV | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| HBANL - PFFV | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| FITBI - PFFV | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| CHSCN - PFFV | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.04% | ||
| CHSCM - PFFV | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.24% | ||
More | ||||