Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFFD vs SPFF
PFFD vs SPFF Comparison
Open Charts PFFD vs SPFF
Global X US Preferred ETF
Price$18.73
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
Volume$1.42K
Net Assets2.26B
Global X SuperIncome™ Preferred ETF
Price$9.05
Change-$0.02 (-0.22%)
Volume$500
Net Assets130.19M
PFFD vs SPFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFFD vs. SPFF commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFFD is a Hold and SPFF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFFD has more net assets: 2.26B vs. SPFF (130M). SPFF has a higher annual dividend yield than PFFD: SPFF (2.953) vs PFFD (1.169). PFFD was incepted earlier than SPFF: PFFD (8 years) vs SPFF (13 years). PFFD (0.23) has a lower expense ratio than SPFF (0.48). SPFF has a higher turnover PFFD (27.10) vs PFFD (27.10).
| PFFD | SPFF | PFFD / SPFF | |
| Gain YTD | 1.169 | 2.953 | 40% |
| Net Assets | 2.26B | 130M | 1,735% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.23 | 0.48 | 48% |
| Turnover | 27.10 | 63.31 | 43% |
| Yield | 6.32 | 6.56 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 13 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| PFFD | SPFF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 64% | 8 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
PFFD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFFD has been closely correlated with HBANP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFFD jumps, then HBANP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PFFD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFFD | 100% | -0.05% | ||
| HBANP - PFFD | 73% Closely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| NTRSO - PFFD | 71% Closely correlated | +0.05% | ||
| ACGLO - PFFD | 67% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| ACGLN - PFFD | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| FITBO - PFFD | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.35% | ||
More | ||||
SPFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPFF has been closely correlated with HBANP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPFF jumps, then HBANP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPFF | 100% | -0.22% | ||
| HBANP - SPFF | 70% Closely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| ACGLN - SPFF | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| HBANL - SPFF | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| FITBI - SPFF | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| CHSCL - SPFF | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.04% | ||
More | ||||