Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFFRX vs RFRCX
PFFRX vs RFRCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFFRX vs. RFRCX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFFRX is a Hold and RFRCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFFRX has more cash in the bank: 4.77B vs. RFRCX (744M). PFFRX pays higher dividends than RFRCX: PFFRX (7.70) vs RFRCX (6.68). PFFRX was incepted earlier than RFRCX: PFFRX (15 years) vs RFRCX (19 years). RFRCX (1.78) is less costly to investors than PFFRX (0.70). RFRCX (80.00) and PFFRX (78.50) have comparable annual turnover. RFRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFFRX: RFRCX (2000) vs PFFRX (2500). PFFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.21 vs. RFRCX (5.72). PFFRX return over 5 years is better than : 37.44 vs. RFRCX (29.00).
| PFFRX | RFRCX | PFFRX / RFRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.76 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.78 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.150 | 1.592 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 5000 | - |
| Net Assets | 4.77B | 744M | 641% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.70 | 6.68 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.21 | 5.72 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.70 | 22.06 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.44 | 29.00 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.52 | 39.30 | 151% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement