Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFFRX vs RFRCX
PFFRX vs RFRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFFRX vs. RFRCX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFFRX is a Hold and RFRCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFFRX has more cash in the bank: 4.98B vs. RFRCX (747M). PFFRX pays higher dividends than RFRCX: PFFRX (7.35) vs RFRCX (6.31). PFFRX was incepted earlier than RFRCX: PFFRX (15 years) vs RFRCX (20 years). RFRCX (1.78) is less costly to investors than PFFRX (0.69). PFFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.30 vs. RFRCX (80.00). RFRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFFRX: RFRCX (2000) vs PFFRX (2500). PFFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.53 vs. RFRCX (6.64). PFFRX return over 5 years is better than : 36.68 vs. RFRCX (27.39).
| PFFRX | RFRCX | PFFRX / RFRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.76 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.78 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.460 | 3.898 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 5000 | - |
| Net Assets | 4.98B | 747M | 667% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.35 | 6.31 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.53 | 6.64 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.60 | 24.16 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.68 | 27.39 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.33 | 44.15 | 143% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement