Ad is loading...
PFFRX vs RFRCX
PFFRX vs RFRCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFFRX vs. RFRCX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFFRX is a Hold and RFRCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFFRX has more cash in the bank: 4.56B vs. RFRCX (728M). PFFRX pays higher dividends than RFRCX: PFFRX (8.01) vs RFRCX (6.99). PFFRX was incepted earlier than RFRCX: PFFRX (15 years) vs RFRCX (19 years). RFRCX (1.78) is less costly to investors than PFFRX (0.70). RFRCX (80.00) and PFFRX (78.50) have comparable annual turnover. RFRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFFRX: RFRCX (2000) vs PFFRX (2500). PFFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.68 vs. RFRCX (4.65). PFFRX return over 5 years is better than : 40.99 vs. RFRCX (34.43).
| PFFRX | RFRCX | PFFRX / RFRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.76 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.78 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.156 | -0.532 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 5000 | - |
| Net Assets | 4.56B | 728M | 627% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.01 | 6.99 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.68 | 4.65 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.92 | 15.23 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.99 | 34.43 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.26 | 36.18 | 156% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...