Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFFRX vs RFRFX
PFFRX vs RFRFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFFRX vs. RFRFX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFFRX is a Hold and RFRFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFFRX has more cash in the bank: 4.98B vs. RFRFX (747M). PFFRX (7.35) and RFRFX (7.34) have matching dividends . PFFRX was incepted earlier than RFRFX: PFFRX (15 years) vs RFRFX (17 years). RFRFX (0.76) is less costly to investors than PFFRX (0.69). PFFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.30 vs. RFRFX (80.00). RFRFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFFRX: RFRFX (0) vs PFFRX (2500). RFRFX (7.75) and PFFRX (7.53) have marching annual gain over last year. PFFRX return over 5 years is better than : 36.68 vs. RFRFX (34.26).
| PFFRX | RFRFX | PFFRX / RFRFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.73 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.76 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.460 | 4.626 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.98B | 747M | 667% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.35 | 7.34 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.53 | 7.75 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.60 | 28.10 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.68 | 34.26 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.33 | 60.06 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement