Ad is loading...
PFFRX vs RFRFX
PFFRX vs RFRFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFFRX vs. RFRFX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFFRX is a Hold and RFRFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFFRX has more cash in the bank: 4.56B vs. RFRFX (727M). RFRFX (8.03) and PFFRX (8.01) have matching dividends . PFFRX was incepted earlier than RFRFX: PFFRX (15 years) vs RFRFX (17 years). RFRFX (0.76) is less costly to investors than PFFRX (0.70). RFRFX (80.00) and PFFRX (78.50) have comparable annual turnover. RFRFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFFRX: RFRFX (0) vs PFFRX (2500). PFFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.80 vs. RFRFX (5.81). RFRFX (41.68) and PFFRX (41.14) have equivalent 5 years return.
| PFFRX | RFRFX | PFFRX / RFRFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.73 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.76 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.049 | -0.238 | 20% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.56B | 727M | 628% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.01 | 8.03 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.80 | 5.81 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.05 | 18.94 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.14 | 41.68 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.43 | 51.29 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...