Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFFRX vs RFRFX
PFFRX vs RFRFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFFRX vs. RFRFX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFFRX is a Hold and RFRFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFFRX has more cash in the bank: 4.83B vs. RFRFX (748M). PFFRX (7.61) and RFRFX (7.57) have matching dividends . PFFRX was incepted earlier than RFRFX: PFFRX (15 years) vs RFRFX (17 years). RFRFX (0.76) is less costly to investors than PFFRX (0.70). RFRFX (80.00) and PFFRX (78.50) have comparable annual turnover. RFRFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFFRX: RFRFX (0) vs PFFRX (2500). PFFRX (7.81) and RFRFX (7.69) have marching annual gain over last year. PFFRX (39.72) and RFRFX (38.41) have equivalent 5 years return.
| PFFRX | RFRFX | PFFRX / RFRFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.73 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.76 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.178 | 3.267 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.83B | 748M | 646% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.61 | 7.57 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.81 | 7.69 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.20 | 30.08 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.72 | 38.41 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.73 | 56.34 | 108% |