Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFFRX vs RFRFX
PFFRX vs RFRFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFFRX vs. RFRFX commentary
Oct 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFFRX is a Hold and RFRFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFFRX has more cash in the bank: 5.2B vs. RFRFX (719M). RFRFX (7.28) and PFFRX (7.28) have matching dividends . PFFRX was incepted earlier than RFRFX: PFFRX (15 years) vs RFRFX (17 years). RFRFX (0.76) is less costly to investors than PFFRX (0.69). PFFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.30 vs. RFRFX (84.00). RFRFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFFRX: RFRFX (0) vs PFFRX (2500). PFFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.89 vs. RFRFX (6.30). PFFRX return over 5 years is better than : 36.84 vs. RFRFX (33.90).
| PFFRX | RFRFX | PFFRX / RFRFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.73 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.76 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.612 | 4.241 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.2B | 719M | 724% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.28 | 7.28 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.89 | 6.30 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.64 | 29.47 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.84 | 33.90 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.48 | 60.32 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers