Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFFRX vs RFRFX
PFFRX vs RFRFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFFRX vs. RFRFX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFFRX is a Hold and RFRFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFFRX has more cash in the bank: 4.96B vs. RFRFX (748M). PFFRX (7.49) and RFRFX (7.43) have matching dividends . PFFRX was incepted earlier than RFRFX: PFFRX (15 years) vs RFRFX (17 years). RFRFX (0.76) is less costly to investors than PFFRX (0.69). PFFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.30 vs. RFRFX (80.00). RFRFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFFRX: RFRFX (0) vs PFFRX (2500). RFRFX (7.83) and PFFRX (7.46) have marching annual gain over last year. PFFRX (37.14) and RFRFX (35.34) have equivalent 5 years return.
| PFFRX | RFRFX | PFFRX / RFRFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.73 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.76 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.701 | 3.922 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.96B | 748M | 663% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.49 | 7.43 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.46 | 7.83 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.33 | 26.50 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.14 | 35.34 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.70 | 59.38 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement