PFGTF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
41.1M
POSC
Price
$1.54
Change
-$0.06 (-3.75%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
442.55K
Interact to see
Advertisement

PFGTF vs POSC

Header iconPFGTF vs POSC Comparison
Open Charts PFGTF vs POSCBanner chart's image
Pacific Edge
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$80K
Capitalization41.1M
Positron
Price$1.54
Change-$0.06 (-3.75%)
Volume$145
Capitalization442.55K
PFGTF vs POSC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PFGTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
POSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PFGTF vs. POSC commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFGTF is a Hold and POSC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (PFGTF: $0.06 vs. POSC: $1.54)
Brand notoriety: PFGTF and POSC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PFGTF: 183% vs. POSC: 1%
Market capitalization -- PFGTF: $41.1M vs. POSC: $442.55K
PFGTF [@Medical Specialties] is valued at $41.1M. POSC’s [@Medical Specialties] market capitalization is $442.55K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $8.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PFGTF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePOSC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PFGTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • POSC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, POSC is a better buy in the long-term than PFGTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PFGTF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while POSC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PFGTF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • POSC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, POSC is a better buy in the short-term than PFGTF.

Price Growth

PFGTF (@Medical Specialties) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while POSC (@Medical Specialties) price change was -4.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was +1.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.17%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Specialties (+1.93% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFGTF($41.1M) has a higher market cap than POSC($443K). POSC YTD gains are higher at: 52.079 vs. PFGTF (1.466). POSC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -699K vs. PFGTF (-16.55M). PFGTF has more cash in the bank: 23.1M vs. POSC (28K). POSC has less debt than PFGTF: POSC (962K) vs PFGTF (2.88M). PFGTF has higher revenues than POSC: PFGTF (7.7M) vs POSC (1.24M).
PFGTFPOSCPFGTF / POSC
Capitalization41.1M443K9,278%
EBITDA-16.55M-699K2,367%
Gain YTD1.46652.0793%
P/E RatioN/A0.09-
Revenue7.7M1.24M623%
Total Cash23.1M28K82,500%
Total Debt2.88M962K299%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PFGTF vs POSC: Fundamental Ratings
PFGTF
POSC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10054
SMR RATING
1..100
97100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5951
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

POSC's Valuation (24) in the null industry is in the same range as PFGTF (39). This means that POSC’s stock grew similarly to PFGTF’s over the last 12 months.

POSC's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PFGTF (100). This means that POSC’s stock grew somewhat faster than PFGTF’s over the last 12 months.

PFGTF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as POSC (100). This means that PFGTF’s stock grew similarly to POSC’s over the last 12 months.

POSC's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as PFGTF (59). This means that POSC’s stock grew similarly to PFGTF’s over the last 12 months.

POSC's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PFGTF (100). This means that POSC’s stock grew similarly to PFGTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PFGTFPOSC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PFGTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
POSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BSFO27.50N/A
N/A
Bank of San Francisco
JBFCY17.99N/A
N/A
Jollibee Foods Corp.
IGPYF0.69N/A
N/A
ARGOSY PPTY LTD.
BMVVF0.04N/A
N/A
Bathurst Metals Corp.
NURAF38.81-0.46
-1.17%
Nomura Research Institute Ltd.

PFGTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PFGTF and WRBY have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PFGTF and WRBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFGTF
1D Price
Change %
PFGTF100%
N/A
WRBY - PFGTF
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
STE - PFGTF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.29%
ESTA - PFGTF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.85%
BIOQ - PFGTF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNNUF - PFGTF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

POSC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that POSC and SLDX have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that POSC and SLDX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To POSC
1D Price
Change %
POSC100%
-4.00%
SLDX - POSC
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GMED - POSC
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.31%
RSMDF - POSC
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RSCF - POSC
8%
Poorly correlated
+7.91%
PFGTF - POSC
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More