PFGTF
Price
$0.10
Change
+$0.08 (+400.00%)
Updated
Jul 29 closing price
Capitalization
41.1M
RSMDF
Price
$16.66
Change
-$8.11 (-32.74%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
32.67B
77 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PFGTF vs RSMDF

Header iconPFGTF vs RSMDF Comparison
Open Charts PFGTF vs RSMDFBanner chart's image
Pacific Edge
Price$0.10
Change+$0.08 (+400.00%)
Volume$60K
Capitalization41.1M
Resmed
Price$16.66
Change-$8.11 (-32.74%)
Volume$208
Capitalization32.67B
PFGTF vs RSMDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PFGTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RSMDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PFGTF vs. RSMDF commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFGTF is a Hold and RSMDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (PFGTF: $0.10 vs. RSMDF: $16.66)
Brand notoriety: PFGTF and RSMDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PFGTF: 87% vs. RSMDF: 4%
Market capitalization -- PFGTF: $41.1M vs. RSMDF: $32.67B
PFGTF [@Medical Specialties] is valued at $41.1M. RSMDF’s [@Medical Specialties] market capitalization is $32.67B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $8.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PFGTF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRSMDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PFGTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RSMDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PFGTF and RSMDF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PFGTF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RSMDF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PFGTF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RSMDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PFGTF is a better buy in the short-term than RSMDF.

Price Growth

PFGTF (@Medical Specialties) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RSMDF (@Medical Specialties) price change was -32.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was +0.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

RSMDF is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Specialties (+0.63% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSMDF($32.7B) has a higher market cap than PFGTF($41.1M). PFGTF YTD gains are higher at: 60.586 vs. RSMDF (-26.927). RSMDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.31B vs. PFGTF (-16.55M). RSMDF has more cash in the bank: 228M vs. PFGTF (23.1M). PFGTF has less debt than RSMDF: PFGTF (2.88M) vs RSMDF (1.72B). RSMDF has higher revenues than PFGTF: RSMDF (4.02B) vs PFGTF (7.7M).
PFGTFRSMDFPFGTF / RSMDF
Capitalization41.1M32.7B0%
EBITDA-16.55M1.31B-1%
Gain YTD60.586-26.927-225%
P/E RatioN/A37.59-
Revenue7.7M4.02B0%
Total Cash23.1M228M10%
Total Debt2.88M1.72B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PFGTF vs RSMDF: Fundamental Ratings
PFGTF
RSMDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9999
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9837
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3542
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10092
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RSMDF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as PFGTF (44). This means that RSMDF’s stock grew similarly to PFGTF’s over the last 12 months.

RSMDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PFGTF (100). This means that RSMDF’s stock grew similarly to PFGTF’s over the last 12 months.

RSMDF's SMR Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PFGTF (98). This means that RSMDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PFGTF’s over the last 12 months.

PFGTF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as RSMDF (42). This means that PFGTF’s stock grew similarly to RSMDF’s over the last 12 months.

RSMDF's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as PFGTF (100). This means that RSMDF’s stock grew similarly to PFGTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PFGTFRSMDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PFGTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RSMDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SSVFF0.16N/A
+0.69%
Southern Silver Exploration Corp.
CDIX1.36N/A
N/A
Cardiff Lexington Corporation
HRSEF116.47N/A
N/A
Hirose Electric
PSKOF23.50N/A
N/A
ORLEN SA
OILCF4.00N/A
N/A
Permex Petroleum Corporation

PFGTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PFGTF and WRBY have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PFGTF and WRBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFGTF
1D Price
Change %
PFGTF100%
N/A
WRBY - PFGTF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.21%
STE - PFGTF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
ESTA - PFGTF
25%
Poorly correlated
-5.09%
BIOQ - PFGTF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNNUF - PFGTF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RSMDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RSMDF and NAOV have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RSMDF and NAOV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RSMDF
1D Price
Change %
RSMDF100%
-32.74%
NAOV - RSMDF
30%
Poorly correlated
-4.75%
RMD - RSMDF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
PFGTF - RSMDF
19%
Poorly correlated
N/A
POSC - RSMDF
9%
Poorly correlated
+5.74%
SAFLF - RSMDF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More