PFLC vs VABK
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFLC is a Hold and VABK is a Sell.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PFLC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVABK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- PFLC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- VABK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
PFLC (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while VABK (@Regional Banks) price change was +8.83% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.82%.
Reported Earning Dates
PFLC is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2023.
VABK is expected to report earnings on Apr 18, 2023.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-0.91% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| PFLC | VABK | PFLC / VABK | |
| Capitalization | 104M | 162M | 64% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.408 | 24.542 | 67% |
| P/E Ratio | 6.67 | 8.15 | 82% |
| Revenue | 55.4M | 63.1M | 88% |
| Total Cash | 16.6M | 7.42M | 224% |
| Total Debt | 13.4M | 53.3M | 25% |
PFLC | VABK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 88 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 44 Fair valued | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 51 | 46 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 48 | 49 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 24 | 10 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 35 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PFLC's Valuation (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VABK (83). This means that PFLC’s stock grew somewhat faster than VABK’s over the last 12 months.
VABK's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as PFLC (51). This means that VABK’s stock grew similarly to PFLC’s over the last 12 months.
PFLC's SMR Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as VABK (49). This means that PFLC’s stock grew similarly to VABK’s over the last 12 months.
VABK's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as PFLC (43). This means that VABK’s stock grew similarly to PFLC’s over the last 12 months.
VABK's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as PFLC (24). This means that VABK’s stock grew similarly to PFLC’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
PFLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PFLC and KNFSF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PFLC and KNFSF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PFLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFLC | 100% | N/A | ||
| KNFSF - PFLC | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| EBTC - PFLC | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.89% | ||
| BPIRY - PFLC | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.74% | ||
| VABK - PFLC | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.17% | ||
| COFS - PFLC | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.30% | ||
More | ||||
VABK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VABK has been loosely correlated with SMBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VABK jumps, then SMBK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VABK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VABK | 100% | +1.17% | ||
| SMBK - VABK | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.68% | ||
| MOFG - VABK | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.22% | ||
| MBCN - VABK | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| HTBI - VABK | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| MCBS - VABK | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.21% | ||
More | ||||