Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFOCX vs TNBMX
PFOCX vs TNBMX Comparison
Open Charts PFOCX vs TNBMX
PIMCO International Bond (USD-Hdg) C
Price$9.95
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.98B
T. Rowe Price Intl Bd (USD Hdgd) I
Price$8.57
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.25B
PFOCX vs TNBMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFOCX vs. TNBMX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFOCX is a Hold and TNBMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFOCX has more cash in the bank: 16B vs. TNBMX (7.25B). TNBMX (3.44) and PFOCX (3.29) have matching dividends . PFOCX was incepted earlier than TNBMX: PFOCX (29 years) vs TNBMX (8 years). PFOCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than TNBMX (0.53). PFOCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 699.00 vs. TNBMX (54.50). PFOCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TNBMX: PFOCX (1000) vs TNBMX (500000). TNBMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.39 vs. PFOCX (2.65). PFOCX return over 5 years is better than : -0.35 vs. TNBMX (-5.88).
| PFOCX | TNBMX | PFOCX / TNBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.53 | 325% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.53 | 325% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.299 | 3.011 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16B | 7.25B | 221% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.29 | 3.44 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.65 | 3.39 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.23 | 6.12 | 184% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.35 | -5.88 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.39 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement