Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFOCX vs TNBMX
PFOCX vs TNBMX Comparison
Open Charts PFOCX vs TNBMX
PIMCO International Bond (USD-Hdg) C
Price$10.02
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.15B
T. Rowe Price Intl Bd (USD Hdgd) I
Price$8.62
Change+$0.01 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.33B
PFOCX vs TNBMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFOCX vs. TNBMX commentary
Oct 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFOCX is a Hold and TNBMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFOCX has more cash in the bank: 16.1B vs. TNBMX (7.33B). TNBMX pays higher dividends than PFOCX: TNBMX (3.45) vs PFOCX (3.27). PFOCX was incepted earlier than TNBMX: PFOCX (29 years) vs TNBMX (8 years). PFOCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than TNBMX (0.53). PFOCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 699.00 vs. TNBMX (54.50). PFOCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TNBMX: PFOCX (1000) vs TNBMX (500000). TNBMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.74 vs. PFOCX (4.18). PFOCX return over 5 years is better than : 0.19 vs. TNBMX (-5.38).
| PFOCX | TNBMX | PFOCX / TNBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.53 | 325% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.53 | 325% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.287 | 3.771 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.1B | 7.33B | 220% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.27 | 3.45 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.18 | 4.74 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.03 | 11.92 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.19 | -5.38 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.79 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers