PFODF
Price
$2.75
Change
+$0.02 (+0.73%)
Updated
Jun 11 closing price
Capitalization
2.2B
STKL
Price
$6.13
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
726.96M
81 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PFODF vs STKL

Header iconPFODF vs STKL Comparison
Open Charts PFODF vs STKLBanner chart's image
Premier Foods
Price$2.75
Change+$0.02 (+0.73%)
Volume$3.7K
Capitalization2.2B
SunOpta
Price$6.13
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$641.01K
Capitalization726.96M
PFODF vs STKL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PFODF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STKL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PFODF vs. STKL commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFODF is a Buy and STKL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (PFODF: $2.75 vs. STKL: $6.13)
Brand notoriety: PFODF and STKL are both not notable
PFODF represents the Food: Major Diversified, while STKL is part of the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PFODF: 100% vs. STKL: 71%
Market capitalization -- PFODF: $2.2B vs. STKL: $726.96M
PFODF [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $2.2B. STKL’s [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] market capitalization is $726.96M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $230.38B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $300.91B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $6.95B. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $20.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PFODF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSTKL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PFODF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • STKL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PFODF is a better buy in the long-term than STKL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PFODF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STKL’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PFODF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • STKL’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, STKL is a better buy in the short-term than PFODF.

Price Growth

PFODF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while STKL (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was -2.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1016.15%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +368.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

STKL is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (+0.96% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-1.39% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFODF($2.2B) has a higher market cap than STKL($727M). PFODF YTD gains are higher at: 10.000 vs. STKL (-20.390). PFODF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 232M vs. STKL (53.9M). PFODF has more cash in the bank: 192M vs. STKL (2.3M). PFODF has less debt than STKL: PFODF (335M) vs STKL (375M). PFODF has higher revenues than STKL: PFODF (1.15B) vs STKL (741M).
PFODFSTKLPFODF / STKL
Capitalization2.2B727M303%
EBITDA232M53.9M430%
Gain YTD10.000-20.390-49%
P/E Ratio14.36N/A-
Revenue1.15B741M155%
Total Cash192M2.3M8,351%
Total Debt335M375M89%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PFODF vs STKL: Fundamental Ratings
PFODF
STKL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4860
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
590
SMR RATING
1..100
7793
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4861
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4022
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PFODF's Valuation (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STKL (87) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that PFODF’s stock grew somewhat faster than STKL’s over the last 12 months.

PFODF's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for STKL (90) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that PFODF’s stock grew significantly faster than STKL’s over the last 12 months.

PFODF's SMR Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as STKL (93) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that PFODF’s stock grew similarly to STKL’s over the last 12 months.

PFODF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as STKL (61) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that PFODF’s stock grew similarly to STKL’s over the last 12 months.

STKL's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as PFODF (40) in the null industry. This means that STKL’s stock grew similarly to PFODF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PFODFSTKL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PFODF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STKL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EMRGX8.13N/A
N/A
Emerging Markets Equities Fund M
RYLAX88.84-0.04
-0.05%
Rydex Leisure H
NSBRX65.35-0.07
-0.11%
Nuveen Dividend Growth I
GLPAX35.84-0.18
-0.50%
Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infras A
ERSGX14.07-0.15
-1.05%
Eaton Vance Small-Cap R

PFODF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PFODF and STKL have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PFODF and STKL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFODF
1D Price
Change %
PFODF100%
N/A
STKL - PFODF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PIFMY - PFODF
12%
Poorly correlated
+9.95%
ORKLY - PFODF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.47%
NFPDF - PFODF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PIFFY - PFODF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More