Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFPWX vs RMFCX
PFPWX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PFPWX vs RMFCX
Parnassus Value Equity Institutional
Price$55.65
Change-$0.29 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.57B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.03
Change-$0.50 (-0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.13B
PFPWX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFPWX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFPWX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. PFPWX (4.57B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than PFPWX: RMFCX (1.27) vs PFPWX (1.12). PFPWX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PFPWX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than PFPWX (0.71). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PFPWX (24.08). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFPWX: RMFCX (250) vs PFPWX (100000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.54 vs. PFPWX (2.27). PFPWX return over 5 years is better than : 62.04 vs. RMFCX (57.10).
| PFPWX | RMFCX | PFPWX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.91 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.91 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.370 | 8.804 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.57B | 109B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 1.27 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.27 | 8.54 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.81 | 29.81 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.04 | 57.10 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.41 | 74.87 | 138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement