Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFPWX vs RMFCX
PFPWX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PFPWX vs RMFCX
Parnassus Value Equity Institutional
Price$60.66
Change+$0.17 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.81B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.20
Change+$0.11 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.47B
PFPWX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFPWX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFPWX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. PFPWX (4.81B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than PFPWX: RMFCX (1.20) vs PFPWX (1.05). PFPWX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PFPWX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than PFPWX (0.71). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PFPWX (24.08). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFPWX: RMFCX (250) vs PFPWX (100000). PFPWX (7.54) and RMFCX (7.44) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFCX (60.80) and PFPWX (59.26) have equivalent 5 years return.
| PFPWX | RMFCX | PFPWX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.91 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.91 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.345 | 14.964 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.81B | 112B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 1.20 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.54 | 7.44 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.78 | 43.84 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.26 | 60.80 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 129.53 | 94.21 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement