Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFPWX vs RMFCX
PFPWX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PFPWX vs RMFCX
Parnassus Value Equity Institutional
Price$56.91
Change+$0.45 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.56B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.62
Change+$0.27 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.45B
PFPWX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFPWX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFPWX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 108B vs. PFPWX (4.56B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than PFPWX: RMFCX (1.26) vs PFPWX (1.09). PFPWX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PFPWX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than PFPWX (0.71). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PFPWX (24.08). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFPWX: RMFCX (250) vs PFPWX (100000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.82 vs. PFPWX (7.09). PFPWX return over 5 years is better than : 58.09 vs. RMFCX (54.97).
| PFPWX | RMFCX | PFPWX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.91 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.91 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.359 | 9.891 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.56B | 108B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 1.26 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.09 | 9.82 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.23 | 25.99 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.09 | 54.97 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.70 | 78.66 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers