Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFPWX vs RMFCX
PFPWX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PFPWX vs RMFCX
Parnassus Value Equity Institutional
Price$52.95
Change+$0.03 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.46B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.33
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.31B
PFPWX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFPWX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFPWX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. PFPWX (4.46B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than PFPWX: RMFCX (1.31) vs PFPWX (1.18). PFPWX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PFPWX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than PFPWX (0.71). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PFPWX (24.08). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFPWX: RMFCX (250) vs PFPWX (100000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.44 vs. PFPWX (-0.08). PFPWX (51.22) and RMFCX (50.95) have equivalent 5 years return.
| PFPWX | RMFCX | PFPWX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.91 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.91 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.627 | 5.423 | 12% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.46B | 105B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.18 | 1.31 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.08 | 8.44 | -1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.74 | 18.47 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.22 | 50.95 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.05 | 69.73 | 136% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement