Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFPWX vs RMFCX
PFPWX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PFPWX vs RMFCX
Parnassus Value Equity Institutional
Price$59.10
Change+$0.11 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.71B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.25
Change+$0.07 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.76B
PFPWX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFPWX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFPWX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. PFPWX (4.71B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than PFPWX: RMFCX (1.24) vs PFPWX (1.07). PFPWX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PFPWX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than PFPWX (0.71). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PFPWX (24.08). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFPWX: RMFCX (250) vs PFPWX (100000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.27 vs. PFPWX (5.92). PFPWX (59.72) and RMFCX (58.03) have equivalent 5 years return.
| PFPWX | RMFCX | PFPWX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.91 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.91 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.379 | 12.767 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.71B | 111B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.24 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.92 | 7.27 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.72 | 33.89 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.72 | 58.03 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 131.76 | 95.98 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement