Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFPWX vs RMFCX
PFPWX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PFPWX vs RMFCX
Parnassus Value Equity Institutional
Price$60.24
Change+$0.09 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.73B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.02
Change+$0.09 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.8B
PFPWX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFPWX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFPWX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. PFPWX (4.73B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than PFPWX: RMFCX (1.21) vs PFPWX (1.03). PFPWX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PFPWX (11 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than PFPWX (0.71). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PFPWX (24.08). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFPWX: RMFCX (250) vs PFPWX (100000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.00 vs. PFPWX (5.45). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.67 vs. PFPWX (42.67).
| PFPWX | RMFCX | PFPWX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.91 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.91 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.546 | 12.783 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.73B | 110B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 1.21 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.45 | 6.00 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.69 | 27.94 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.67 | 52.67 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.51 | 84.73 | 147% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers