PFS
Price
$16.40
Change
-$0.30 (-1.80%)
Updated
Jun 2, 04:33 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.1B
53 days until earnings call
PGC
Price
$27.40
Change
-$0.02 (-0.07%)
Updated
Jun 2, 04:32 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
428.6M
57 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PFS vs PGC

Header iconPFS vs PGC Comparison
Open Charts PFS vs PGCBanner chart's image
Provident Financial Services
Price$16.40
Change-$0.30 (-1.80%)
Volume$240
Capitalization1.1B
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
Price$27.40
Change-$0.02 (-0.07%)
Volume$600
Capitalization428.6M
PFS vs PGC Comparison Chart
Loading...
PFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PFS vs. PGC commentary
Jun 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFS is a Hold and PGC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 02, 2025
Stock price -- (PFS: $16.70 vs. PGC: $27.42)
Brand notoriety: PFS and PGC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PFS: 82% vs. PGC: 81%
Market capitalization -- PFS: $1.1B vs. PGC: $428.6M
PFS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.1B. PGC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $428.6M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PFS’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePGC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PFS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PGC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PFS and PGC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PFS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PGC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PFS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PGC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PGC is a better buy in the short-term than PFS.

Price Growth

PFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.21% price change this week, while PGC (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

PFS is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2025.

PGC is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.36% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFS($1.1B) has a higher market cap than PGC($429M). PGC has higher P/E ratio than PFS: PGC (8.96) vs PFS (8.49). PFS YTD gains are higher at: -9.142 vs. PGC (-14.165). PFS has more cash in the bank: 189M vs. PGC (7.4M). PGC has less debt than PFS: PGC (553M) vs PFS (1.46B). PFS has higher revenues than PGC: PFS (479M) vs PGC (226M).
PFSPGCPFS / PGC
Capitalization1.1B429M256%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-9.142-14.16565%
P/E Ratio8.498.9695%
Revenue479M226M212%
Total Cash189M7.4M2,554%
Total Debt1.46B553M264%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PFS vs PGC: Fundamental Ratings
PFS
PGC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5158
SMR RATING
1..100
912
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5760
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1215
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PFS's Valuation (30) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as PGC (35) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to PGC’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as PGC (58) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to PGC’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's SMR Rating (9) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as PGC (12) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to PGC’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as PGC (60) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to PGC’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as PGC (15) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to PGC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PFSPGC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KCVIX17.370.04
+0.23%
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Value I
DDIIX14.72N/A
N/A
Macquarie Wealth Builder Institutional
NAMAX13.63-0.03
-0.22%
Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Instl
DFSTX46.27-0.16
-0.34%
DFA US Small Cap I
MMEAX38.50-0.30
-0.77%
Victory Integrity Discovery A

PFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFS has been closely correlated with BHLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFS jumps, then BHLB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFS
1D Price
Change %
PFS100%
-0.60%
BHLB - PFS
91%
Closely correlated
-1.32%
HOPE - PFS
90%
Closely correlated
-1.18%
FFBC - PFS
90%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
PPBI - PFS
90%
Closely correlated
-0.93%
SFNC - PFS
89%
Closely correlated
-0.69%
More

PGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PGC has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PGC jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PGC
1D Price
Change %
PGC100%
-0.90%
UBSI - PGC
85%
Closely correlated
-0.66%
HBNC - PGC
85%
Closely correlated
-0.27%
BHB - PGC
85%
Closely correlated
-1.36%
PFS - PGC
85%
Closely correlated
-0.60%
PEBO - PGC
84%
Closely correlated
-0.85%
More