PFS vs SBCF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFS is a Hold and SBCF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PFS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSBCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- PFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SBCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PFS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBCF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PFS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SBCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
PFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а -6.39% price change this week, while SBCF (@Regional Banks) price change was -4.47% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.15%.
Reported Earning Dates
PFS is expected to report earnings on Jan 24, 2025.
SBCF is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-2.53% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| PFS | SBCF | PFS / SBCF | |
| Capitalization | 1.1B | 2.1B | 52% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.839 | -0.229 | -5,172% |
| P/E Ratio | 8.49 | 20.13 | 42% |
| Revenue | 479M | 567M | 84% |
| Total Cash | 189M | 168M | 113% |
| Total Debt | 1.46B | 156M | 935% |
PFS | SBCF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 69 | 85 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 46 Fair valued | 76 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 97 | 96 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 13 | 13 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | 57 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PFS's Valuation (46) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as SBCF (76) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to SBCF’s over the last 12 months.
SBCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (96) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PFS (97) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that SBCF’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.
SBCF's SMR Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PFS (13) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that SBCF’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.
PFS's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as SBCF (51) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to SBCF’s over the last 12 months.
PFS's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBCF (57) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBCF’s over the last 12 months.
| PFS | SBCF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 60% | 27 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 65% |
PFS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFS has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFS jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PFS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFS | 100% | +2.25% | ||
| UBSI - PFS | 89% Closely correlated | +1.33% | ||
| NWBI - PFS | 87% Closely correlated | +1.37% | ||
| BHLB - PFS | 87% Closely correlated | +2.81% | ||
| FFBC - PFS | 87% Closely correlated | +1.92% | ||
| FCF - PFS | 87% Closely correlated | +0.83% | ||
More | ||||