PFS
Price
$19.54
Change
-$0.02 (-0.10%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
2.55B
28 days until earnings call
TMP
Price
$68.22
Change
-$0.12 (-0.18%)
Updated
Sep 26, 12:20 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
986.25M
28 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PFS vs TMP

Header iconPFS vs TMP Comparison
Open Charts PFS vs TMPBanner chart's image
Provident Financial Services
Price$19.54
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
Volume$383.52K
Capitalization2.55B
Tompkins Financial
Price$68.22
Change-$0.12 (-0.18%)
Volume$500
Capitalization986.25M
PFS vs TMP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PFS vs. TMP commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFS is a StrongBuy and TMP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (PFS: $19.54 vs. TMP: $68.34)
Brand notoriety: PFS and TMP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PFS: 64% vs. TMP: 64%
Market capitalization -- PFS: $2.55B vs. TMP: $986.25M
PFS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.55B. TMP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $986.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $164.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PFS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTMP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TMP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PFS is a better buy in the long-term than TMP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PFS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TMP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PFS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TMP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TMP is a better buy in the short-term than PFS.

Price Growth

PFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.84% price change this week, while TMP (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

PFS is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

TMP is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.65% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFS($2.55B) has a higher market cap than TMP($986M). TMP has higher P/E ratio than PFS: TMP (12.31) vs PFS (10.51). PFS YTD gains are higher at: 7.650 vs. TMP (3.692). PFS has more cash in the bank: 234M vs. TMP (81.4M). TMP has less debt than PFS: TMP (673M) vs PFS (2.68B). PFS has higher revenues than TMP: PFS (839M) vs TMP (314M).
PFSTMPPFS / TMP
Capitalization2.55B986M259%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD7.6503.692207%
P/E Ratio10.5112.3185%
Revenue839M314M267%
Total Cash234M81.4M287%
Total Debt2.68B673M398%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PFS vs TMP: Fundamental Ratings
PFS
TMP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6161
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4675
SMR RATING
1..100
1425
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5051
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9199
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5031

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PFS's Valuation (21) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as TMP (44) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to TMP’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as TMP (75) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to TMP’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's SMR Rating (14) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as TMP (25) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to TMP’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as TMP (51) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to TMP’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's P/E Growth Rating (91) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as TMP (99) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to TMP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PFSTMP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MCBVX29.71N/A
N/A
MFS Mid Cap Value B
NRFYX11.52N/A
N/A
Natixis AEW Global Focused Real Estate Y
IMLPX10.15N/A
N/A
MainGate MLP I
WRAIX14.17N/A
N/A
Wilmington Global Alpha Equities I
PDARX11.98N/A
N/A
Principal Diversified Real Asset R6