Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFSVX vs SSGSX
PFSVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PFSVX vs SSGSX
iMGP Small Company Fund Instl Cl
Price$14.29
Change-$0.12 (-0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.66M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.49
Change-$0.48 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.56B
PFSVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFSVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFSVX is a StrongBuy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.56B vs. PFSVX (51.7M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than PFSVX: SSGSX (0.50) vs PFSVX (0.26). PFSVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PFSVX (5 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). PFSVX (1.30) and SSGSX (1.26) have similar cost to investors . PFSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 148.82 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFSVX: SSGSX (2500) vs PFSVX (10000). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.53 vs. PFSVX (-10.89). PFSVX return over 5 years is better than : 38.79 vs. SSGSX (17.10).
| PFSVX | SSGSX | PFSVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.26 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.26 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.369 | -0.991 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 2500 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.7M | 5.56B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.26 | 0.50 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.89 | -4.53 | 241% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.82 | -8.81 | -89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.79 | 17.10 | 227% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 16.44 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement