Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFSVX vs SSGSX
PFSVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PFSVX vs SSGSX
iMGP Small Company Fund Instl Cl
Price$13.78
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets55.84M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$44.46
Change+$0.08 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.98B
PFSVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFSVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFSVX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 4.98B vs. PFSVX (55.8M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than PFSVX: SSGSX (0.49) vs PFSVX (0.25). PFSVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PFSVX (5 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). PFSVX (1.30) and SSGSX (1.26) have similar cost to investors . PFSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 148.82 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFSVX: SSGSX (2500) vs PFSVX (10000). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -14.44 vs. PFSVX (-20.75). PFSVX return over 5 years is better than : 19.80 vs. SSGSX (2.06).
| PFSVX | SSGSX | PFSVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.26 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.26 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.681 | -4.415 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 2500 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 55.8M | 4.98B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 0.49 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | -20.75 | -14.44 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.18 | -10.47 | -30% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.80 | 2.06 | 960% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 12.64 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement