Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFUPX vs RCWCX
PFUPX vs RCWCX Comparison
Open Charts PFUPX vs RCWCX
PIMCO International Bond (Unhedged) I-2
Price$7.85
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets930.48M
American Funds Capital World Bond R3
Price$16.45
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.99B
PFUPX vs RCWCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFUPX vs. RCWCX commentary
Aug 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFUPX is a Hold and RCWCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCWCX has more cash in the bank: 9.99B vs. PFUPX (930M). PFUPX pays higher dividends than RCWCX: PFUPX (4.06) vs RCWCX (3.18). PFUPX was incepted earlier than RCWCX: PFUPX (17 years) vs RCWCX (23 years). RCWCX (1.13) is less costly to investors than PFUPX (0.87). PFUPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 646.00 vs. RCWCX (251.00). RCWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFUPX: RCWCX (250) vs PFUPX (1000000). PFUPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.06 vs. RCWCX (3.29). PFUPX return over 5 years is better than : -9.95 vs. RCWCX (-14.43).
| PFUPX | RCWCX | PFUPX / RCWCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.13 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.13 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.783 | 7.274 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 930M | 9.99B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.06 | 3.18 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.06 | 3.29 | 215% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.10 | 5.13 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.95 | -14.43 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.72 | 1.48 | 588% |