Ad is loading...
PFUPX vs RCWCX
PFUPX vs RCWCX Comparison
Open Charts PFUPX vs RCWCX
PIMCO International Bond (Unhedged) I-2
Price$7.84
Change-$0.02 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets683.39M
American Funds Capital World Bond R3
Price$16.42
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.04B
PFUPX vs RCWCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFUPX vs. RCWCX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFUPX is a Hold and RCWCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCWCX has more cash in the bank: 10B vs. PFUPX (683M). PFUPX pays higher dividends than RCWCX: PFUPX (4.17) vs RCWCX (2.99). PFUPX was incepted earlier than RCWCX: PFUPX (17 years) vs RCWCX (23 years). RCWCX (1.13) is less costly to investors than PFUPX (0.87). PFUPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 641.00 vs. RCWCX (251.00). RCWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFUPX: RCWCX (250) vs PFUPX (1000000). PFUPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.07 vs. RCWCX (7.31). PFUPX return over 5 years is better than : -1.23 vs. RCWCX (-9.15).
| PFUPX | RCWCX | PFUPX / RCWCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.13 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.13 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.822 | 6.147 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 683M | 10B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.17 | 2.99 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.07 | 7.31 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.09 | 2.04 | 200% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.23 | -9.15 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.92 | -2.46 | -78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers