Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGBHX vs RGACX
PGBHX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts PGBHX vs RGACX
PGBHX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGBHX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGBHX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. PGBHX (6.5B). PGBHX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . PGBHX was incepted earlier than RGACX: PGBHX (10 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than PGBHX (0.60). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. PGBHX (20.90). PGBHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: PGBHX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.70 vs. PGBHX (-20.00). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 10.51 vs. PGBHX (-3.39).
| PGBHX | RGACX | PGBHX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.93 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.93 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.213 | 8.560 | -14% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.5B | 353B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -20.00 | -1.70 | 1,180% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.84 | 42.09 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.39 | 10.51 | -32% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 99.22 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement