Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGBHX vs RGACX
PGBHX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts PGBHX vs RGACX
Principal Blue Chip R6
Price$51.83
Change-$0.07 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.65B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$85.25
Change+$0.06 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
PGBHX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGBHX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGBHX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. PGBHX (11.7B). PGBHX pays higher dividends than RGACX: PGBHX (0.10) vs RGACX (0.07). PGBHX was incepted earlier than RGACX: PGBHX (9 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than PGBHX (0.60). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PGBHX (14.70). PGBHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: PGBHX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.97 vs. PGBHX (12.37). PGBHX return over 5 years is better than : 59.97 vs. RGACX (46.16).
| PGBHX | RGACX | PGBHX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.94 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.94 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.655 | 18.419 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.7B | 340B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.10 | 0.07 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.37 | 16.97 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 77.87 | 61.65 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.97 | 46.16 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 100.90 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement