Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGBHX vs RGAFX
PGBHX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts PGBHX vs RGAFX
Principal Blue Chip R6
Price$51.72
Change-$0.11 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.65B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$88.07
Change-$0.43 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
PGBHX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGBHX vs. RGAFX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGBHX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. PGBHX (11.7B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than PGBHX: RGAFX (0.55) vs PGBHX (0.10). PGBHX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: PGBHX (9 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). PGBHX (0.60) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PGBHX (14.70). PGBHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: PGBHX (0) vs RGAFX (250). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.13 vs. PGBHX (11.95). PGBHX return over 5 years is better than : 61.70 vs. RGAFX (50.03).
| PGBHX | RGAFX | PGBHX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.34 | 168% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.34 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.503 | 18.342 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.7B | 340B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.10 | 0.55 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.95 | 17.13 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 77.63 | 63.63 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.70 | 50.03 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 106.58 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement