Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGEMX vs RLBFX
PGEMX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PGEMX vs RLBFX
George Putnam Balanced M
Price$27.56
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.29B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.69
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.25B
PGEMX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGEMX vs. RLBFX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGEMX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. PGEMX (2.3B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than PGEMX: RLBFX (2.05) vs PGEMX (1.12). PGEMX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PGEMX (31 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). PGEMX (1.43) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). PGEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). PGEMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: PGEMX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.77 vs. PGEMX (8.69). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.27 vs. PGEMX (31.33).
| PGEMX | RLBFX | PGEMX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.29 | 493% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.29 | 493% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.370 | 13.349 | 78% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.3B | 263B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 2.05 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.69 | 9.77 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.18 | 44.38 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.33 | 44.27 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.83 | 82.55 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers