Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGEYX vs RLBCX
PGEYX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PGEYX vs RLBCX
George Putnam Balanced Y
Price$28.40
Change+$0.06 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.26B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.54
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.74B
PGEYX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGEYX vs. RLBCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGEYX is a Hold and RLBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. PGEYX (2.27B). PGEYX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: PGEYX (1.99) vs RLBCX (1.46). PGEYX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PGEYX (32 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). RLBCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than PGEYX (0.68). PGEYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). PGEYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PGEYX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.62 vs. PGEYX (8.06). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.95 vs. PGEYX (32.28).
| PGEYX | RLBCX | PGEYX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.89 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.89 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.787 | 13.744 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.27B | 263B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.99 | 1.46 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.06 | 8.62 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.84 | 39.76 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.28 | 36.95 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.62 | 67.89 | 141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement