Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGF vs VRP
PGF vs VRP Comparison
Open Charts PGF vs VRP
Invesco Financial Preferred ETF
Price$14.73
Change-$0.03 (-0.20%)
Volume$82.21K
Net Assets803.22M
Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF
Price$24.78
Change+$0.02 (+0.08%)
Volume$354.82K
Net Assets2.27B
PGF vs VRP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGF vs. VRP commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGF is a Hold and VRP is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VRP has more net assets: 2.27B vs. PGF (803M). VRP has a higher annual dividend yield than PGF: VRP (6.665) vs PGF (6.012). PGF was incepted earlier than VRP: PGF (19 years) vs VRP (11 years). VRP (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than PGF (0.54). PGF has a higher turnover VRP (16.00) vs VRP (16.00).
| PGF | VRP | PGF / VRP | |
| Gain YTD | 6.012 | 6.665 | 90% |
| Net Assets | 803M | 2.27B | 35% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.50 | 108% |
| Turnover | 21.00 | 16.00 | 131% |
| Yield | 6.10 | 5.71 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| PGF | VRP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 19% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 41% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 68% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 71% | 12 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 21% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
PGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PGF has been closely correlated with HBANP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PGF jumps, then HBANP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGF | 100% | -0.20% | ||
| HBANP - PGF | 75% Closely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| ACGLO - PGF | 73% Closely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| ACGLN - PGF | 70% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| NTRSO - PGF | 68% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| FITBO - PGF | 68% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
VRP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VRP has been loosely correlated with VLYPN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VRP jumps, then VLYPN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VRP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VRP | 100% | +0.08% | ||
| VLYPN - VRP | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| HBANL - VRP | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.16% | ||
| CNOBP - VRP | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.14% | ||
| FITBI - VRP | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.20% | ||
| CHSCN - VRP | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.44% | ||
More | ||||