Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGF vs VRP
PGF vs VRP Comparison
Open Charts PGF vs VRP
Invesco Financial Preferred ETF
Price$14.95
Change+$0.13 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets816.28M
Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF
Price$24.88
Change+$0.04 (+0.16%)
Volume$14.12K
Net AssetsN/A
PGF vs VRP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGF vs. VRP commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGF is a StrongBuy and VRP is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PGF has a higher annual dividend yield than VRP: PGF (6.970) vs VRP (6.564). PGF was incepted earlier than VRP: PGF (19 years) vs VRP (11 years). VRP (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than PGF (0.54). PGF has a higher turnover VRP (16.00) vs VRP (16.00).
| PGF | VRP | PGF / VRP | |
| Gain YTD | 6.970 | 6.564 | 106% |
| Net Assets | 816M | N/A | - |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.50 | 108% |
| Turnover | 21.00 | 16.00 | 131% |
| Yield | 6.15 | 5.73 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| PGF | VRP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 10% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 31% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 68% | 6 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 15 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 19% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
PGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PGF has been closely correlated with HBANP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PGF jumps, then HBANP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGF | 100% | +0.81% | ||
| HBANP - PGF | 75% Closely correlated | +0.80% | ||
| ACGLO - PGF | 73% Closely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| ACGLN - PGF | 70% Closely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| FITBO - PGF | 68% Closely correlated | +0.52% | ||
| NTRSO - PGF | 67% Closely correlated | +0.05% | ||
More | ||||
VRP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VRP has been loosely correlated with HBANL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VRP jumps, then HBANL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VRP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VRP | 100% | +0.12% | ||
| HBANL - VRP | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.08% | ||
| VLYPN - VRP | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| CNOBP - VRP | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.21% | ||
| CHSCN - VRP | 18% Poorly correlated | -0.26% | ||
| MBINM - VRP | 16% Poorly correlated | +0.04% | ||
More | ||||