Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGIRX vs RNPCX
PGIRX vs RNPCX Comparison
Open Charts PGIRX vs RNPCX
Polen Global Growth Investor
Price$27.47
Change+$0.11 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets345.76M
American Funds New Perspective R3
Price$70.81
Change-$0.20 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.63B
PGIRX vs RNPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGIRX vs. RNPCX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGIRX is a Buy and RNPCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPCX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. PGIRX (346M). RNPCX pays higher dividends than PGIRX: RNPCX (0.22) vs PGIRX (0.00). PGIRX was incepted earlier than RNPCX: PGIRX (10 years) vs RNPCX (23 years). PGIRX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RNPCX (1.06). PGIRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RNPCX (24.00). RNPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGIRX: RNPCX (250) vs PGIRX (3000). RNPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.27 vs. PGIRX (5.19). RNPCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.91 vs. PGIRX (27.43).
| PGIRX | RNPCX | PGIRX / RNPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.06 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.06 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.841 | 17.879 | 33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 250 | 1,200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 346M | 163B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.22 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.19 | 14.27 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.47 | 50.27 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.43 | 36.91 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.52 | 98.22 | 171% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers