Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGMCX vs RCEEX
PGMCX vs RCEEX Comparison
Open Charts PGMCX vs RCEEX
PIMCO Global Core Asset Allocation C
Price$14.39
Change-$0.10 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets282.42M
American Funds Capital Income Bldr R2E
Price$73.43
Change-$0.62 (-0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.41B
PGMCX vs RCEEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGMCX vs. RCEEX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGMCX is a Buy and RCEEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCEEX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. PGMCX (282M). RCEEX pays higher dividends than PGMCX: RCEEX (2.70) vs PGMCX (0.51). PGMCX was incepted earlier than RCEEX: PGMCX (17 years) vs RCEEX (11 years). PGMCX (2.38) is less costly to investors than RCEEX (1.07). PGMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 594.00 vs. RCEEX (56.00). RCEEX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGMCX: RCEEX (250) vs PGMCX (1000). RCEEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.90 vs. PGMCX (9.17). RCEEX return over 5 years is better than : 47.84 vs. PGMCX (40.95).
| PGMCX | RCEEX | PGMCX / RCEEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.31 | 1.07 | 216% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 1.07 | 222% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.926 | 7.541 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 282M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 2.70 | 19% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.17 | 9.90 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.08 | 21.64 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.95 | 47.84 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.49 | 35.78 | 144% |