Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGPCX vs RLBBX
PGPCX vs RLBBX Comparison
Open Charts PGPCX vs RLBBX
George Putnam Balanced C
Price$28.04
Change+$0.06 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.31B
American Funds American Balanced R2
Price$38.70
Change+$0.06 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets266.1B
PGPCX vs RLBBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPCX vs. RLBBX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPCX is a Buy and RLBBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBBX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. PGPCX (2.31B). RLBBX pays higher dividends than PGPCX: RLBBX (1.11) vs PGPCX (0.91). PGPCX was incepted earlier than RLBBX: PGPCX (26 years) vs RLBBX (23 years). PGPCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBBX (1.32). PGPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RLBBX (44.00). PGPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBBX: PGPCX (0) vs RLBBX (250). RLBBX (8.76) and PGPCX (8.58) have marching annual gain over last year. RLBBX return over 5 years is better than : 39.21 vs. PGPCX (29.85).
| PGPCX | RLBBX | PGPCX / RLBBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.32 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.32 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.389 | 14.056 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.31B | 266B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 1.11 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.58 | 8.76 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.39 | 48.35 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.85 | 39.21 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.93 | 69.12 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers