Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGPCX vs RLBBX
PGPCX vs RLBBX Comparison
Open Charts PGPCX vs RLBBX
George Putnam Balanced C
Price$27.73
Change+$0.11 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.29B
American Funds American Balanced R2
Price$38.33
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.06B
PGPCX vs RLBBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPCX vs. RLBBX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPCX is a Buy and RLBBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBBX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. PGPCX (2.29B). RLBBX pays higher dividends than PGPCX: RLBBX (1.15) vs PGPCX (0.93). PGPCX was incepted earlier than RLBBX: PGPCX (26 years) vs RLBBX (23 years). PGPCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBBX (1.32). PGPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RLBBX (44.00). PGPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBBX: PGPCX (0) vs RLBBX (250). RLBBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.14 vs. PGPCX (8.37). RLBBX return over 5 years is better than : 37.89 vs. PGPCX (28.66).
| PGPCX | RLBBX | PGPCX / RLBBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.32 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.32 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.721 | 12.856 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.29B | 263B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 1.15 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.37 | 9.14 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.61 | 40.59 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.66 | 37.89 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.08 | 71.66 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement