Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGPCX vs RLBCX
PGPCX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PGPCX vs RLBCX
George Putnam Balanced C
Price$28.04
Change+$0.06 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.31B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.77
Change+$0.06 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.73B
PGPCX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPCX vs. RLBCX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPCX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. PGPCX (2.31B). RLBCX pays higher dividends than PGPCX: RLBCX (1.49) vs PGPCX (0.91). PGPCX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PGPCX (26 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). PGPCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). PGPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). PGPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PGPCX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.24 vs. PGPCX (8.58). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 41.76 vs. PGPCX (29.85).
| PGPCX | RLBCX | PGPCX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.89 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.89 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.389 | 14.423 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.31B | 266B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 1.49 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.58 | 9.24 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.39 | 50.17 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.85 | 41.76 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.93 | 73.69 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement