Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGPCX vs RLBCX
PGPCX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PGPCX vs RLBCX
George Putnam Balanced C
Price$25.64
Change-$0.05 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.13B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$35.40
Change-$0.04 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.2B
PGPCX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPCX vs. RLBCX commentary
Jun 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPCX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 244B vs. PGPCX (2.14B). RLBCX pays higher dividends than PGPCX: RLBCX (1.63) vs PGPCX (1.05). PGPCX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PGPCX (26 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). PGPCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). PGPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). PGPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PGPCX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.18 vs. PGPCX (3.64). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 35.64 vs. PGPCX (26.66).
| PGPCX | RLBCX | PGPCX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.89 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.89 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.764 | 4.265 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.14B | 244B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 1.63 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.64 | 4.18 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.42 | 31.27 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.66 | 35.64 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.66 | 54.20 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement