Ad is loading...
PGPCX vs RLBCX
PGPCX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PGPCX vs RLBCX
George Putnam Balanced C
Price$23.59
Change+$0.23 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$32.90
Change+$0.35 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets223.62B
PGPCX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPCX vs. RLBCX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPCX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 224B vs. PGPCX (1.94B). RLBCX pays higher dividends than PGPCX: RLBCX (1.69) vs PGPCX (1.26). PGPCX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PGPCX (26 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). PGPCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). RLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. PGPCX (80.00). PGPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PGPCX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.57 vs. PGPCX (-1.26). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.56 vs. PGPCX (26.44).
| PGPCX | RLBCX | PGPCX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.89 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.89 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.285 | -3.321 | 219% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.94B | 224B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 1.69 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.26 | 0.57 | -223% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.22 | 9.53 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.44 | 33.56 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.84 | 43.10 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...