Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGPCX vs RLBCX
PGPCX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PGPCX vs RLBCX
George Putnam Balanced C
Price$27.73
Change+$0.11 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.29B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.39
Change+$0.07 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.06B
PGPCX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPCX vs. RLBCX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPCX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. PGPCX (2.29B). RLBCX pays higher dividends than PGPCX: RLBCX (1.53) vs PGPCX (0.93). PGPCX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PGPCX (26 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). PGPCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). PGPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). PGPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PGPCX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.50 vs. PGPCX (8.37). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 40.28 vs. PGPCX (28.66).
| PGPCX | RLBCX | PGPCX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.89 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.89 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.721 | 13.071 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.29B | 263B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 1.53 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.37 | 9.50 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.61 | 42.14 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.66 | 40.28 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.08 | 76.06 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement