Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGPCX vs RLBCX
PGPCX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PGPCX vs RLBCX
George Putnam Balanced C
Price$27.82
Change+$0.05 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.26B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.54
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.74B
PGPCX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPCX vs. RLBCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPCX is a Hold and RLBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. PGPCX (2.27B). RLBCX pays higher dividends than PGPCX: RLBCX (1.46) vs PGPCX (1.14). PGPCX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PGPCX (26 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). PGPCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). PGPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). PGPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PGPCX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.62 vs. PGPCX (6.94). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.95 vs. PGPCX (25.46).
| PGPCX | RLBCX | PGPCX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.89 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.89 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.795 | 13.744 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.27B | 263B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 1.46 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.94 | 8.62 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.34 | 39.76 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.46 | 36.95 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.94 | 67.89 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement