Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGPCX vs RLBEX
PGPCX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts PGPCX vs RLBEX
George Putnam Balanced C
Price$28.04
Change+$0.06 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.31B
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$38.96
Change+$0.06 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.73B
PGPCX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPCX vs. RLBEX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPCX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. PGPCX (2.31B). RLBEX pays higher dividends than PGPCX: RLBEX (1.74) vs PGPCX (0.91). PGPCX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: PGPCX (26 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). PGPCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). PGPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RLBEX (44.00). PGPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBEX: PGPCX (0) vs RLBEX (250). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.60 vs. PGPCX (8.58). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 43.58 vs. PGPCX (29.85).
| PGPCX | RLBEX | PGPCX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.59 | 285% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.59 | 285% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.389 | 14.690 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.31B | 266B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 1.74 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.58 | 9.60 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.39 | 51.48 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.85 | 43.58 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.93 | 79.24 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement