Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGPCX vs RLBEX
PGPCX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts PGPCX vs RLBEX
George Putnam Balanced C
Price$27.73
Change+$0.11 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.29B
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$38.57
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.06B
PGPCX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPCX vs. RLBEX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPCX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. PGPCX (2.29B). RLBEX pays higher dividends than PGPCX: RLBEX (1.79) vs PGPCX (0.93). PGPCX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: PGPCX (26 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). PGPCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). PGPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RLBEX (44.00). PGPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBEX: PGPCX (0) vs RLBEX (250). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.80 vs. PGPCX (8.37). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 42.00 vs. PGPCX (28.66).
| PGPCX | RLBEX | PGPCX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.59 | 285% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.59 | 285% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.721 | 13.230 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.29B | 263B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 1.79 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.37 | 9.80 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.61 | 43.28 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.66 | 42.00 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.08 | 81.58 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement