Ad is loading...
PGPCX vs RLBEX
PGPCX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts PGPCX vs RLBEX
George Putnam Balanced C
Price$23.59
Change+$0.23 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.96B
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$33.06
Change+$0.36 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets226.04B
PGPCX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPCX vs. RLBEX commentary
Apr 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPCX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 226B vs. PGPCX (1.96B). RLBEX pays higher dividends than PGPCX: RLBEX (1.97) vs PGPCX (1.26). PGPCX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: PGPCX (26 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). PGPCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.60). RLBEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. PGPCX (80.00). PGPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBEX: PGPCX (0) vs RLBEX (250). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.89 vs. PGPCX (-0.29). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 35.33 vs. PGPCX (27.69).
| PGPCX | RLBEX | PGPCX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.60 | 280% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.60 | 280% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.372 | -3.234 | 197% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.96B | 226B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 1.97 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.29 | 0.89 | -33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.31 | 10.36 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.69 | 35.33 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.26 | 47.53 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...